Post match interviews v WBA

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
Vegas Claret
Posts: 34426
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 12536 times
Has Liked: 6262 times
Location: clue is in the title

Post match interviews v WBA

Post by Vegas Claret » Thu Nov 07, 2024 10:59 pm


Vegas Claret
Posts: 34426
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 12536 times
Has Liked: 6262 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Post match interviews v WBA

Post by Vegas Claret » Thu Nov 07, 2024 11:03 pm


Vegas Claret
Posts: 34426
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 12536 times
Has Liked: 6262 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Post match interviews v WBA

Post by Vegas Claret » Thu Nov 07, 2024 11:08 pm


Wile E Coyote
Posts: 8831
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:22 pm
Been Liked: 3016 times
Has Liked: 1860 times

Re: Post match interviews v WBA

Post by Wile E Coyote » Fri Nov 08, 2024 12:18 am

Scott knows he did his bit, the team were worthy of three points, sadly the officiating was from Aldi on a slow day.
horrific refereeing , a massive blow to us, and a game we deserved to win.

warksclaret
Posts: 8518
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 2259 times
Has Liked: 1241 times

Re: Post match interviews v WBA

Post by warksclaret » Fri Nov 08, 2024 8:35 am

Wile E Coyote wrote:
Fri Nov 08, 2024 12:18 am
Scott knows he did his bit, the team were worthy of three points, sadly the officiating was from Aldi on a slow day.
horrific refereeing , a massive blow to us, and a game we deserved to win.
The Championship is a lottery without VAR. The offside decisions are absolutely clinical and yesterdays goal by Anthony would have got us the 3 points. Having said that we would have lost to Blackburn with their disallowed goal being clearly ONSIDE

BabylonClaret
Posts: 3297
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:51 pm
Been Liked: 745 times
Has Liked: 664 times

Re: Post match interviews v WBA

Post by BabylonClaret » Fri Nov 08, 2024 9:05 am

But we also had a penalty turned down. Anyway even if jot we would still be at least a point better off. It was a truly awful decision. Baffling

Paulclaret
Posts: 393
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
Been Liked: 150 times
Has Liked: 310 times
Location: Bournemouth

Re: Post match interviews v WBA

Post by Paulclaret » Fri Nov 08, 2024 9:09 am

VAR would have made no difference last night. They would not have overturned the referee's decision, because he did touch the defender and they would have said it was down to the ref's interpretation of the so called 'foul'.

Andreshotboots
Posts: 2031
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 6:05 pm
Been Liked: 775 times
Has Liked: 126 times

Re: Post match interviews v WBA

Post by Andreshotboots » Fri Nov 08, 2024 9:11 am

warksclaret wrote:
Fri Nov 08, 2024 8:35 am
The Championship is a lottery without VAR. The offside decisions are absolutely clinical and yesterdays goal by Anthony would have got us the 3 points. Having said that we would have lost to Blackburn with their disallowed goal being clearly ONSIDE
Don't forget Preston had a perfectly good goal disallowed against us too so it's swings and roundabouts regarding the goal, you win some you lose some.

The clear home team biass on any 50/50 decisions was what was inexcusable for me from the officials.

BurnleyFC
Posts: 6711
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 2100 times
Has Liked: 1047 times

Re: Post match interviews v WBA

Post by BurnleyFC » Fri Nov 08, 2024 9:23 am

warksclaret wrote:
Fri Nov 08, 2024 8:35 am
The Championship is a lottery without VAR. The offside decisions are absolutely clinical and yesterdays goal by Anthony would have got us the 3 points. Having said that we would have lost to Blackburn with their disallowed goal being clearly ONSIDE
Did Bastards have a goal disallowed? I genuinely can’t remember.

I do remember Preston having a good goal ruled out.

summitclaret
Posts: 4497
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
Been Liked: 1003 times
Has Liked: 1595 times
Location: burnley

Re: Post match interviews v WBA

Post by summitclaret » Fri Nov 08, 2024 10:25 am

Paulclaret wrote:
Fri Nov 08, 2024 9:09 am
VAR would have made no difference last night. They would not have overturned the referee's decision, because he did touch the defender and they would have said it was down to the ref's interpretation of the so called 'foul'.
Sorry but the ref was in no position to see of there was a push. The lino would have been though. Did he speak to the ref via audio. If he did he needs to resign.

Paulclaret
Posts: 393
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
Been Liked: 150 times
Has Liked: 310 times
Location: Bournemouth

Re: Post match interviews v WBA

Post by Paulclaret » Fri Nov 08, 2024 10:51 am

summitclaret wrote:
Fri Nov 08, 2024 10:25 am
Sorry but the ref was in no position to see of there was a push. The lino would have been though. Did he speak to the ref via audio. If he did he needs to resign.
The fact that, in our opinion, the ref was in no position to see is totally irrelevant. VAR would only interfere if there was a clear and obvious error. The fact that there was a touch in the defender's back would mean that it was solely down to the referee's opinion whether or not in hindered him and VAR would stick with his decision.

The fact that the ref was a wrong and a complete tosser is not in question. :lol:

Post Reply