Tricky Trevor wrote: ↑Thu Mar 13, 2025 7:17 pmI’m the only one on here but I saw a nailed on red card. The Baggie had played it forward, ball had gone, and he hacked at him.
Not disappointed mind I don’t want E-R & E-Steve broken up.
[/quote
It was a trip, clear and simple. Yellow everyday. WBA players turned it into a frenzy. Ref overreacted. Appeals Panel saw it for what it was. Parker will not be banned.
No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
-
- Posts: 4497
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
- Been Liked: 1003 times
- Has Liked: 1595 times
- Location: burnley
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
-
- Posts: 76619
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37341 times
- Has Liked: 5702 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Really? That's not a red card in any way shape or form - that's why it's been rescinded.Tricky Trevor wrote: ↑Thu Mar 13, 2025 7:17 pmI’m the only one on here but I saw a nailed on red card. The Baggie had played it forward, ball had gone, and he hacked at him.
Not disappointed mind I don’t want E-R & E-Steve broken up.
-
- Posts: 6711
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
- Been Liked: 2100 times
- Has Liked: 1047 times
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Really good news.
Can the ban be transferred to that utter clown of a referee instead?
Can the ban be transferred to that utter clown of a referee instead?
These 2 users liked this post: Stayingup mybloodisclaret
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Great news made my night. Like a lot on here thought it was a terrible decision but thought it may have been supported by the panel.
-
- Posts: 11477
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
- Been Liked: 2249 times
- Has Liked: 1357 times
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Great news. Lot of humble pie being eaten by the buffoons on here who stated it was a clear red and also a huge black mark for the ref. Hopefully he will never take control of another Burnley game We have had more than our share of him this season
These 3 users liked this post: northeastclaret Stan Tastic mybloodisclaret
-
- Posts: 448
- Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 140 times
- Has Liked: 39 times
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
You are not the only one.Tricky Trevor wrote: ↑Thu Mar 13, 2025 7:17 pmI’m the only one on here but I saw a nailed on red card. The Baggie had played it forward, ball had gone, and he hacked at him.
Not disappointed mind I don’t want E-R & E-Steve broken up.
Commentators said definite red
In real time I thought he retaliated and that is usually a red.
Really glad it’s been overturned but you can’t always see these things through claret tinted glasses.
-
- Posts: 7653
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
- Been Liked: 1917 times
- Has Liked: 4254 times
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Apparently yes.dougcollins wrote: ↑Thu Mar 13, 2025 7:27 pmCan you give a yellow after the final whistle?
I don't think I've ever seen it. A fair few reds over the years.
"The referee's authority to take disciplinary action (yellow and red cards) extends from the moment they enter the field of play for the pre-match inspection until they leave the field after the match ends"
-
- Posts: 7653
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
- Been Liked: 1917 times
- Has Liked: 4254 times
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
But it wasn't retaliation to anything, just a simple trip.Ilkley claret wrote: ↑Thu Mar 13, 2025 8:01 pmYou are not the only one.
Commentators said definite red
In real time I thought he retaliated and that is usually a red.
-
- Posts: 639
- Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2020 1:35 pm
- Been Liked: 111 times
- Has Liked: 284 times
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Common sense has prevailed .
The next step is for the referee to be stood down and recommended for further training, only to return to lower league officiating when seen as match ready by the FA.
The next step is for the referee to be stood down and recommended for further training, only to return to lower league officiating when seen as match ready by the FA.
-
- Posts: 19504
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
- Been Liked: 4300 times
- Has Liked: 8520 times
- Location: Derbyshire
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Huge relief, is that.
We're going to need CJ.
We're going to need CJ.
This user liked this post: Dark Cloud
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Excellent. Ref will be examined now. Good. Hopeless.
-
- Posts: 5455
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2016 3:41 am
- Been Liked: 1182 times
- Has Liked: 3666 times
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Best news in a good while.....made my day!
Hopefully we never have that bell-end ref us again.
Hopefully we never have that bell-end ref us again.
-
- Posts: 8517
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 2259 times
- Has Liked: 1241 times
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Just the sort of news our fans need at this critical stage of the season- common sense prevails
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
He bloody well ahoukd be. It's a tough job and we are seriously short on good officials but this one was dreadful.fidelcastro wrote: ↑Thu Mar 13, 2025 5:43 pmWeird one that. I thought managers spoke to officials after virtually every game.
As for the ref, has he purposely been stood down this weekend?
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Well, if you ignore the rather similar big team bias, the inability to review penalties (which would mean that they would not have reviewed the cj foul), the "nothing the passer" calls that regularly benefit certain qb's and not others, the lack of consistency on pass interference, yes.CoolClaret wrote: ↑Thu Mar 13, 2025 7:21 pm
You may not like American Football, but the level of officiating is light years ahead of association football in England. Genuinely think we could learn a lot from that sport.
I'd say that their review process is much better run than our var, though.
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Ilkley claret wrote: ↑Thu Mar 13, 2025 8:01 pmYou are not the only one.
Commentators said definite red
In real time I thought he retaliated and that is usually a red.
Really glad it’s been overturned but you can’t always see these things through claret tinted glasses.
Yeah I thought it was a red. Would just describe it as a kick rather than a hack... Nice bit of spin to say he was just trying to stop him getting through on goal. I don't believe that for a second. either way, happy it's not gonna count!
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Some common sense applied. Not much around these days do good to see.
-
- Posts: 5192
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
- Been Liked: 1474 times
- Has Liked: 1462 times
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Got to be a big positive in the key games coming up. Of course every game from now on is a key game. Every game whatever the league position of the opposition !
-
- Posts: 6707
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1434 times
- Has Liked: 9454 times
- Location: Chiang Rai, Thailand.
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Really good news!
-
- Posts: 449
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2019 2:46 am
- Been Liked: 66 times
- Has Liked: 28 times
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
CJ didn't get where he is today without getting bans rescinded.
These 11 users liked this post: martin_p dougcollins Claretitus Folkestoneclaret fatboy47 hoskinsgoalatswansea Stayingup longsidepies whalleyclaret addisclaret Wokingclaret
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Now there’s a reference you’d have to be in your mid 50s (at least) to getClaretinJapan wrote: ↑Fri Mar 14, 2025 5:34 amCJ didn't get where he is today without getting bans rescinded.

-
- Posts: 9139
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
- Been Liked: 2371 times
- Has Liked: 2342 times
- Location: Yarkshire
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Good work.ClaretinJapan wrote: ↑Fri Mar 14, 2025 5:34 amCJ didn't get where he is today without getting bans rescinded.
-
- Posts: 1709
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:39 pm
- Been Liked: 444 times
- Has Liked: 278 times
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Very funny. For those of us of a certain age, that remember.ClaretinJapan wrote: ↑Fri Mar 14, 2025 5:34 amCJ didn't get where he is today without getting bans rescinded.
-
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2023 12:03 pm
- Been Liked: 38 times
- Has Liked: 32 times
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
For those who don't remember - or aren't senior enough...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VSl759zq3-o
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VSl759zq3-o
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 7609 times
- Has Liked: 1582 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
It was very obviously retaliation for being barged for no reason.nil_desperandum wrote: ↑Thu Mar 13, 2025 8:06 pmBut it wasn't retaliation to anything, just a simple trip.
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Would be interesting to know if the referee's assessor on the night gave a truthful assessment of him or if it was more of a “boys club” assessment.
-
- Posts: 4497
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
- Been Liked: 1003 times
- Has Liked: 1595 times
- Location: burnley
-
- Posts: 18547
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 7609 times
- Has Liked: 1582 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
I know, I was just responding to someone who claimed it wasn’t retaliatory, which it obviously was.summitclaret wrote: ↑Fri Mar 14, 2025 9:44 amYes, but it was a just a trip and not worthy of a red card.
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Thank God.
-
- Posts: 453
- Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2017 3:39 pm
- Been Liked: 121 times
- Has Liked: 179 times
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Great news. But I was more incensed by his complete incompetence at the free kick from which WBA scored.
-
- Posts: 2895
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2016 8:04 pm
- Been Liked: 920 times
- Has Liked: 5700 times
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Commentators?? As if that makes absolutely any difference, when you have clowns like Don Goodman and Andy Hinchcliffe on Sky.Ilkley claret wrote: ↑Thu Mar 13, 2025 8:01 pmYou are not the only one.
Commentators said definite red
In real time I thought he retaliated and that is usually a red.
Really glad it’s been overturned but you can’t always see these things through claret tinted glasses.
Commentators / summarises often have an agenda or a way in which they lean / support and that often comes through in their words. Leeds love in? They would have been begging for CJER to be arrested had that been against a Leeds player.
Never ever seen a red card. Ward is an incompetent moron, who happens to think it's all about him.
-
- Posts: 3042
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:55 pm
- Been Liked: 658 times
- Has Liked: 2273 times
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
I think what helped CJ win the appeal was the lack of a full follow through. It was more like a Tommy Fleetwood 3/4 follow through.
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Tbh he just legged him up. It was the reaction of the WBA players and resulting ruck that influenced the ref
-
- Posts: 3704
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:50 pm
- Been Liked: 691 times
- Has Liked: 207 times
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
What’s happening about Scott Parker’s ban?
-
- Posts: 2601
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 367 times
- Has Liked: 975 times
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
He has to be charged first and then he will be given time to respond
Then a fine and Ban.
Might be less already, as he has apologised for not knowing the rule of approaching the ref at the final whistle
-
- Posts: 3042
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:55 pm
- Been Liked: 658 times
- Has Liked: 2273 times
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Ignorance of the law is no excuse.
-
- Posts: 2961
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:07 pm
- Been Liked: 880 times
- Has Liked: 1659 times
- Location: Mostly Europe
Re: No ban for CJ Egan-Riley
Has he already had a ban this season? Kompany had at least 1 each season from memory. I don’t remember Dyche having any.