Tonight's footy
-
- Posts: 34425
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12536 times
- Has Liked: 6262 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Tonight's footy
how was that not a pen for Everton ? MacAllister isn't even looking for the ball
-
- Posts: 34425
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12536 times
- Has Liked: 6262 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Tonight's footy
surely a crossPoulton-le-Claret wrote: ↑Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:34 pmSome goal from Tonali if he meant it
https://x.com/WinningG0al/status/190752 ... gr%5Etweet
Re: Tonight's footy
Al-Dakhil just won in the German semi final to reach the DFB Pokal final with Stuttgart
These 2 users liked this post: CoolClaret Colburn_Claret
Re: Tonight's footy
Of course corruption isn't the only reason.RickyBobby wrote: ↑Wed Apr 02, 2025 8:59 pmPremier league, corrupt as…
The only reason not to give that is corruption. There is no other reason. How Mac Allister hasn’t broken his leg is a miracle. A true horror challenge.
-
- Posts: 814
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:41 am
- Been Liked: 282 times
- Has Liked: 237 times
Re: Tonight's footy
The officials must have decided that Tark's challenge didn't fall within the description of Serious Foul Play. Frankly a puzzling decision when you read the description of this red card offence in Law 12- Fouls and Miscnduct....wilks_bfc wrote: ↑Wed Apr 02, 2025 8:53 pmTheres a difference between he should have been sent off and he could have been sent off.
Could he have been sent off for it? Yes
Should he have been sent off for it? Maybe, but on one of those rare occasions the officials have used common sense in that it wasn’t out of control, malicious or intended and it was his momentum after clearing the ball
We saw those challenges often enough from Tarky whilst he was with us, one in particular against his current employers.
We weren’t saying he should have been sent of after those.
https://www.thefa.com/football-rules-go ... misconduct
-
- Posts: 9806
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 3104 times
- Has Liked: 3096 times
Re: Tonight's footy
He's one that I really wanted to keep - didn't think the fee we got anywhere near justified his potential.
Congratulations to him, hope Stuttgart win it!
These 2 users liked this post: ChrisG boatshed bill
Re: Tonight's footy
He did Eintracht a favour last weekend by getting sent off against themCoolClaret wrote: ↑Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:46 pmHe's one that I really wanted to keep - didn't think the fee we got anywhere near justified his potential.
Congratulations to him, hope Stuttgart win it!
Re: Tonight's footy
Me too but don't think he'd have been given the game time with the emergence of Egan-Riley this seasonCoolClaret wrote: ↑Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:46 pmHe's one that I really wanted to keep - didn't think the fee we got anywhere near justified his potential.
Congratulations to him, hope Stuttgart win it!
-
- Posts: 10444
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 pm
- Been Liked: 3069 times
- Has Liked: 2434 times
Re: Tonight's footy
Ref has been awful all night. Regularly letting the first foul go, generally grappling by Everton, and then given the FK t’other way after the Red has thrown them off.
Should have booked Pickford for the hack on Nunez but books Nunez for who knows what.
Should have booked Pickford for the hack on Nunez but books Nunez for who knows what.
-
- Posts: 9806
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 3104 times
- Has Liked: 3096 times
-
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:59 am
- Been Liked: 284 times
- Has Liked: 3712 times
- Location: North Yorkshire
Re: Tonight's footy
He was off the pitch receiving treatment and rolled himself back onto the pitch to stop the game continuing. Good decision.
-
- Posts: 1741
- Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2024 6:12 pm
- Been Liked: 534 times
- Has Liked: 1273 times
Re: Tonight's footy
You would think and I have only seen that one bad angle, but Sky Sports were reporting that it looked like he did intend to shoot!
-
- Posts: 13019
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
- Been Liked: 3663 times
- Has Liked: 2111 times
- Contact:
Re: Tonight's footy
They should do. They play Arminia Bielefeld who are in the third-divisionCoolClaret wrote: ↑Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:46 pmHe's one that I really wanted to keep - didn't think the fee we got anywhere near justified his potential.
Congratulations to him, hope Stuttgart win it!
They have beaten 4 Bundesliga teams to get there though.
-
- Posts: 34425
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12536 times
- Has Liked: 6262 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Tonight's footy
yeah I only saw your link, mental if he meant it but he did smash it !Poulton-le-Claret wrote: ↑Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:55 pmYou would think and I have only seen that one bad angle, but Sky Sports were reporting that it looked like he did intend to shoot!
This user liked this post: Poulton-le-Claret
-
- Posts: 17184
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3525 times
- Has Liked: 7714 times
Re: Tonight's footy
Without doubt a better option than anything we have as back up right nowboatshed bill wrote: ↑Wed Apr 02, 2025 10:32 pmBut if we could have kept him at his age we could have loaned him rather than sell.
I thought he'd make a great defender given a season to develop.
-
- Posts: 5233
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
- Been Liked: 2942 times
- Has Liked: 829 times
Re: Tonight's footy
I can never understand why people use this sort of still as evidence. “Got the ball ref”? Well yeah, he cleared the ball miles down the pitch. It’s unfortunate that Mac Allisters run took him across Tarkowski like that but they’re both 100% going for the ball and Tarkowski just got there first. That’s what happens in football sometimes. It’s an excellent challenge and if we’re even giving a foul for that, football is ******.
This incident is actually almost identical to the Cullen/Twine one from Saturday. Two players going for the ball, one stretches, gets there first by miles and the other player gets caught as they run across the first player. That wasn’t a foul either.
The question in both situations is what is the player supposed to do? Football is fast paced and they want to win ball and they both won it cleanly and fairly. The alternative is to not go for the it, which is ridiculous.
-
- Posts: 76614
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37341 times
- Has Liked: 5702 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Tonight's footy
A decision that has also puzzled PGMOL who have confirmed this morning that Tarky should have been sent off. I can half accept that Sam Barrott, the on field referee, might have not had the best of angles but what on earth was Paul Tierney doing on VAR not to send him to the screen?Claretnick wrote: ↑Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:45 pmThe officials must have decided that Tark's challenge didn't fall within the description of Serious Foul Play. Frankly a puzzling decision when you read the description of this red card offence in Law 12- Fouls and Miscnduct....
https://www.thefa.com/football-rules-go ... misconduct
-
- Posts: 5192
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
- Been Liked: 1474 times
- Has Liked: 1462 times
Re: Tonight's footy
I've no problem with anyone who thinks Tarkowski shouldn't have been sent off although I would point out to them they are ignorant of the law of the game that deals with this incident
It is worth paying attention that there is no reference that I can see to winning the ball in making the tackle. Whether the ball is won or not is irrelevant.
Unnecessary excessive force at speed was clearly used to win the ball, clearly a red card offence. Pleasing to read so many ex pros condemning the tackle.
It is worth paying attention that there is no reference that I can see to winning the ball in making the tackle. Whether the ball is won or not is irrelevant.
Unnecessary excessive force at speed was clearly used to win the ball, clearly a red card offence. Pleasing to read so many ex pros condemning the tackle.
This user liked this post: fatboy47
-
- Posts: 5233
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
- Been Liked: 2942 times
- Has Liked: 829 times
Re: Tonight's footy
The very obvious mistake you’re making there is calling it a tackle. It’s a clearance. It’s not at excessive speed or force because the has to go in like that to play the ball cleanly. If he doesn’t he’d be risking fouling the opponent who would likely get there first.
-
- Posts: 5192
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
- Been Liked: 1474 times
- Has Liked: 1462 times
Re: Tonight's footy
How many clearances do you see where the defender goes through the opponent with both feet off the ground leaving the opponent needing treatment ?
It's laughable to say Tarkowski had to go in like that but you are entitled to your opinion even though it's at odds with people who played the game
It's laughable to say Tarkowski had to go in like that but you are entitled to your opinion even though it's at odds with people who played the game
Re: Tonight's footy
James Tarkowski post game:quoonbeatz wrote: ↑Thu Apr 03, 2025 10:35 amThe very obvious mistake you’re making there is calling it a tackle. It’s a clearance. It’s not at excessive speed or force because the has to go in like that to play the ball cleanly. If he doesn’t he’d be risking fouling the opponent who would likely get there first.
‘I’ve apologised, it’s not a great tackle from me.’
Last edited by RVclaret on Thu Apr 03, 2025 11:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 5233
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
- Been Liked: 2942 times
- Has Liked: 829 times
Re: Tonight's footy
How else would he have won the ball?
He didn’t go through the his opponent, they came across him and were caught by the follow through. Massive difference.
He didn’t go through the his opponent, they came across him and were caught by the follow through. Massive difference.
-
- Posts: 20415
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4516 times
- Has Liked: 2032 times
Re: Tonight's footy
This is what puzzled me. Would have taken a couple of minutes at most, which, compared with the time someClaretTony wrote: ↑Thu Apr 03, 2025 10:00 am...but what on earth was Paul Tierney doing on VAR not to send him to the screen?
offside decisions take is nowt.