the 96 sponsor.....
-
- Posts: 2078
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 1:16 am
- Been Liked: 655 times
- Has Liked: 637 times
Re: the 96 sponsor.....
Will this delay the shirt release for next season...
Re: the 96 sponsor.....
Didn't oak furniture land go out of business?FeedTheArf wrote: ↑Sat May 17, 2025 5:30 pmProbably rubbish, but the lad in the club shop reckoned it’d either be ALK or Oak Furniture Land on the shirts instead
Re: the 96 sponsor.....
It's an awkward one. Big international brands can find it attractive as you get the name on media coverage, etc but they aren't that interested in clubs like Burnley because they don't have that much media coverage (Wrexham being the obvious exception).Chester Perry wrote: ↑Fri May 16, 2025 8:42 pmno it isn't - not for the money it the sponsorship is worth - the problem all sponsors have is that the whole world would just call it Turf Moor - that is what 142 years of history does
So you end up with smaller brands who suffer from everyone calling it by the old name so the money isn't really that good for what is quite a symbolic sacrifice. I think Bolton make about a £500k a year for theirs for instance.
-
- Posts: 8143
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 12:50 pm
- Been Liked: 2428 times
- Has Liked: 3469 times
- Location: Praha
- Contact:
Re: the 96 sponsor.....
Tbf Bolton's was built as the Reebok, so it's never really had an organic name. The Horwich Bowl is hardly better ehaggi wrote: ↑Tue May 20, 2025 10:28 amIt's an awkward one. Big international brands can find it attractive as you get the name on media coverage, etc but they aren't that interested in clubs like Burnley because they don't have that much media coverage (Wrexham being the obvious exception).
So you end up with smaller brands who suffer from everyone calling it by the old name so the money isn't really that good for what is quite a symbolic sacrifice. I think Bolton make about a £500k a year for theirs for instance.

Re: the 96 sponsor.....
I still call it the Reebok, so it worked on someone
This user liked this post: cockneyclaret
Re: the 96 sponsor.....
Yes, one of the benefits of new stadiums is they don't have the historic names associated with them so you can get names to stick (like the Emirates and Etihad). Spurs have been very careful to not have people call the new stadium White Hart Lane so they can stick a new name on it when the price is right.ŽižkovClaret wrote: ↑Tue May 20, 2025 10:31 amTbf Bolton's was built as the Reebok, so it's never really had an organic name. The Horwich Bowl is hardly better eh![]()
These 2 users liked this post: Foshiznik dsr
-
- Posts: 3210
- Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 6:22 pm
- Been Liked: 852 times
- Has Liked: 419 times
Re: the 96 sponsor.....
I would bloody hope so! Who wants to be known as The TrashBet Stadium?Chester Perry wrote: ↑Fri May 16, 2025 8:42 pmno it isn't - not for the money it the sponsorship is worth - the problem all sponsors have is that the whole world would just call it Turf Moor - that is what 142 years of history does
-
- Posts: 8143
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 12:50 pm
- Been Liked: 2428 times
- Has Liked: 3469 times
- Location: Praha
- Contact:
Re: the 96 sponsor.....
For 20m they can call it the Grandads Thai Bride Enormodome
-
- Posts: 1463
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:15 am
- Been Liked: 436 times
- Has Liked: 178 times
-
- Posts: 4230
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 am
- Been Liked: 3036 times
- Has Liked: 342 times
Re: the 96 sponsor.....
Usual reminder, it's nowhere near as filthy as the sport you follow, with it's human trafficking, racism and misogyny on and off the pitch, large scale violent disorder - remember Burnley fans have killed 2 people in the last 20 years or so and domestic abuse reports rise massively after a bad result for club or country, mass corruption in the ruling organizations... and the list goes on. But keep drawing the line at gambling, which is a legal pastime enjoyed by millions in a responsible manner.
These 3 users liked this post: ŽižkovClaret Enola Gay JohnMcGreal
-
- Posts: 435
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 6:01 am
- Been Liked: 119 times
- Has Liked: 101 times
-
- Posts: 8143
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 12:50 pm
- Been Liked: 2428 times
- Has Liked: 3469 times
- Location: Praha
- Contact:
Re: the 96 sponsor.....
I wonder what people would make of clubs over here. Leagues sponsored by bookies, teams named after and sponsored by arms manufacturers....... think some might need smelling salts if they ever take the blinkers off.dandeclaret wrote: ↑Wed May 21, 2025 5:06 pmUsual reminder, it's nowhere near as filthy as the sport you follow, with it's human trafficking, racism and misogyny on and off the pitch, large scale violent disorder - remember Burnley fans have killed 2 people in the last 20 years or so and domestic abuse reports rise massively after a bad result for club or country, mass corruption in the ruling organizations... and the list goes on. But keep drawing the line at gambling, which is a legal pastime enjoyed by millions in a responsible manner.
-
- Posts: 2483
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:37 am
- Been Liked: 1458 times
- Has Liked: 468 times
Re: the 96 sponsor.....
So you do concede that the gambling industry is a bit grubby, then. Just not as bad as other elements of the sport it's sunk its claws into.dandeclaret wrote: ↑Wed May 21, 2025 5:06 pmUsual reminder, it's nowhere near as filthy as the sport you follow, with it's human trafficking, racism and misogyny on and off the pitch, large scale violent disorder - remember Burnley fans have killed 2 people in the last 20 years or so and domestic abuse reports rise massively after a bad result for club or country, mass corruption in the ruling organizations... and the list goes on. But keep drawing the line at gambling, which is a legal pastime enjoyed by millions in a responsible manner.
I do agree with you on all those things BTW, I just think the gambling lobby is far too powerful and unfortunately has nothing to fear from governments and regulators who are only too happy to keep watching the £ rolling in, regardless of the social costs elsewhere.
It's a shame but there we go. It's not likely to change.
-
- Posts: 3284
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:01 am
- Been Liked: 737 times
- Has Liked: 64 times
Re: the 96 sponsor.....

Being Adidas in please , both kit design and sponsor would look great.
-
- Posts: 4230
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 am
- Been Liked: 3036 times
- Has Liked: 342 times
Re: the 96 sponsor.....
I think there’s a difference between well regulated established bookmakers within the jurisdiction who spend ever increasing amounts on identification and prevention of harm capabilities, and white label overseas bookmakers who ride the market until the regulator catches up with them and forces them to close, like the sponsors in the shirt. You can’t lump them all in together.JohnMcGreal wrote: ↑Wed May 21, 2025 8:35 pmSo you do concede that the gambling industry is a bit grubby, then. Just not as bad as other elements of the sport it's sunk its claws into.
I do agree with you on all those things BTW, I just think the gambling lobby is far too powerful and unfortunately has nothing to fear from governments and regulators who are only too happy to keep watching the £ rolling in, regardless of the social costs elsewhere.
It's a shame but there we go. It's not likely to change.
This user liked this post: ŽižkovClaret