the 96 sponsor.....

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
ArmchairDetective
Posts: 2078
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 1:16 am
Been Liked: 655 times
Has Liked: 637 times

Re: the 96 sponsor.....

Post by ArmchairDetective » Tue May 20, 2025 9:49 am

Will this delay the shirt release for next season...

GetIntoEm
Posts: 2810
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2022 12:17 pm
Been Liked: 754 times
Has Liked: 220 times

Re: the 96 sponsor.....

Post by GetIntoEm » Tue May 20, 2025 10:06 am

FeedTheArf wrote:
Sat May 17, 2025 5:30 pm
Probably rubbish, but the lad in the club shop reckoned it’d either be ALK or Oak Furniture Land on the shirts instead
Didn't oak furniture land go out of business?

aggi
Posts: 9653
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
Been Liked: 2319 times

Re: the 96 sponsor.....

Post by aggi » Tue May 20, 2025 10:28 am

Chester Perry wrote:
Fri May 16, 2025 8:42 pm
no it isn't - not for the money it the sponsorship is worth - the problem all sponsors have is that the whole world would just call it Turf Moor - that is what 142 years of history does
It's an awkward one. Big international brands can find it attractive as you get the name on media coverage, etc but they aren't that interested in clubs like Burnley because they don't have that much media coverage (Wrexham being the obvious exception).

So you end up with smaller brands who suffer from everyone calling it by the old name so the money isn't really that good for what is quite a symbolic sacrifice. I think Bolton make about a £500k a year for theirs for instance.

ŽižkovClaret
Posts: 8143
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 12:50 pm
Been Liked: 2428 times
Has Liked: 3469 times
Location: Praha
Contact:

Re: the 96 sponsor.....

Post by ŽižkovClaret » Tue May 20, 2025 10:31 am

aggi wrote:
Tue May 20, 2025 10:28 am
It's an awkward one. Big international brands can find it attractive as you get the name on media coverage, etc but they aren't that interested in clubs like Burnley because they don't have that much media coverage (Wrexham being the obvious exception).

So you end up with smaller brands who suffer from everyone calling it by the old name so the money isn't really that good for what is quite a symbolic sacrifice. I think Bolton make about a £500k a year for theirs for instance.
Tbf Bolton's was built as the Reebok, so it's never really had an organic name. The Horwich Bowl is hardly better eh :)

GetIntoEm
Posts: 2810
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2022 12:17 pm
Been Liked: 754 times
Has Liked: 220 times

Re: the 96 sponsor.....

Post by GetIntoEm » Tue May 20, 2025 10:33 am

I still call it the Reebok, so it worked on someone
This user liked this post: cockneyclaret

aggi
Posts: 9653
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
Been Liked: 2319 times

Re: the 96 sponsor.....

Post by aggi » Tue May 20, 2025 10:41 am

ŽižkovClaret wrote:
Tue May 20, 2025 10:31 am
Tbf Bolton's was built as the Reebok, so it's never really had an organic name. The Horwich Bowl is hardly better eh :)
Yes, one of the benefits of new stadiums is they don't have the historic names associated with them so you can get names to stick (like the Emirates and Etihad). Spurs have been very careful to not have people call the new stadium White Hart Lane so they can stick a new name on it when the price is right.
These 2 users liked this post: Foshiznik dsr

Roosterbooster
Posts: 3210
Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 6:22 pm
Been Liked: 852 times
Has Liked: 419 times

Re: the 96 sponsor.....

Post by Roosterbooster » Tue May 20, 2025 11:28 am

GetIntoEm wrote:
Tue May 20, 2025 10:06 am
Didn't oak furniture land go out of business?
I was in one at the weekend so I don't think so

Went into administration at one point but saved

IanMcL
Posts: 34403
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 6900 times
Has Liked: 10238 times

Re: the 96 sponsor.....

Post by IanMcL » Wed May 21, 2025 1:43 pm

Chester Perry wrote:
Fri May 16, 2025 8:42 pm
no it isn't - not for the money it the sponsorship is worth - the problem all sponsors have is that the whole world would just call it Turf Moor - that is what 142 years of history does
I would bloody hope so! Who wants to be known as The TrashBet Stadium?

ŽižkovClaret
Posts: 8143
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 12:50 pm
Been Liked: 2428 times
Has Liked: 3469 times
Location: Praha
Contact:

Re: the 96 sponsor.....

Post by ŽižkovClaret » Wed May 21, 2025 3:14 pm

For 20m they can call it the Grandads Thai Bride Enormodome

Bosscat
Posts: 28786
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:51 am
Been Liked: 9632 times
Has Liked: 20693 times

Re: the 96 sponsor.....

Post by Bosscat » Wed May 21, 2025 3:19 pm

GetIntoEm wrote:
Tue May 20, 2025 10:06 am
Didn't oak furniture land go out of business?
They advertise on TV so must have been brought out of Administration ....

FeedTheArf
Posts: 1463
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:15 am
Been Liked: 436 times
Has Liked: 178 times

Re: the 96 sponsor.....

Post by FeedTheArf » Wed May 21, 2025 4:51 pm

GetIntoEm wrote:
Tue May 20, 2025 10:06 am
Didn't oak furniture land go out of business?
Did they? I thought they just shut the Burnley shop.

dandeclaret
Posts: 4230
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 am
Been Liked: 3036 times
Has Liked: 342 times

Re: the 96 sponsor.....

Post by dandeclaret » Wed May 21, 2025 5:06 pm

jdrobbo wrote:
Fri May 16, 2025 8:46 pm
Not surprised in the slightest. It’s an absolutely filthy business.
Usual reminder, it's nowhere near as filthy as the sport you follow, with it's human trafficking, racism and misogyny on and off the pitch, large scale violent disorder - remember Burnley fans have killed 2 people in the last 20 years or so and domestic abuse reports rise massively after a bad result for club or country, mass corruption in the ruling organizations... and the list goes on. But keep drawing the line at gambling, which is a legal pastime enjoyed by millions in a responsible manner.
These 3 users liked this post: ŽižkovClaret Enola Gay JohnMcGreal

Les Lawrence
Posts: 435
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 6:01 am
Been Liked: 119 times
Has Liked: 101 times

Re: the 96 sponsor.....

Post by Les Lawrence » Wed May 21, 2025 5:09 pm

Wtf

ŽižkovClaret
Posts: 8143
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 12:50 pm
Been Liked: 2428 times
Has Liked: 3469 times
Location: Praha
Contact:

Re: the 96 sponsor.....

Post by ŽižkovClaret » Wed May 21, 2025 5:12 pm

dandeclaret wrote:
Wed May 21, 2025 5:06 pm
Usual reminder, it's nowhere near as filthy as the sport you follow, with it's human trafficking, racism and misogyny on and off the pitch, large scale violent disorder - remember Burnley fans have killed 2 people in the last 20 years or so and domestic abuse reports rise massively after a bad result for club or country, mass corruption in the ruling organizations... and the list goes on. But keep drawing the line at gambling, which is a legal pastime enjoyed by millions in a responsible manner.
I wonder what people would make of clubs over here. Leagues sponsored by bookies, teams named after and sponsored by arms manufacturers....... think some might need smelling salts if they ever take the blinkers off.

JohnMcGreal
Posts: 2483
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:37 am
Been Liked: 1458 times
Has Liked: 468 times

Re: the 96 sponsor.....

Post by JohnMcGreal » Wed May 21, 2025 8:35 pm

dandeclaret wrote:
Wed May 21, 2025 5:06 pm
Usual reminder, it's nowhere near as filthy as the sport you follow, with it's human trafficking, racism and misogyny on and off the pitch, large scale violent disorder - remember Burnley fans have killed 2 people in the last 20 years or so and domestic abuse reports rise massively after a bad result for club or country, mass corruption in the ruling organizations... and the list goes on. But keep drawing the line at gambling, which is a legal pastime enjoyed by millions in a responsible manner.
So you do concede that the gambling industry is a bit grubby, then. Just not as bad as other elements of the sport it's sunk its claws into.

I do agree with you on all those things BTW, I just think the gambling lobby is far too powerful and unfortunately has nothing to fear from governments and regulators who are only too happy to keep watching the £ rolling in, regardless of the social costs elsewhere.

It's a shame but there we go. It's not likely to change.

Hedontplayforyou
Posts: 3284
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:01 am
Been Liked: 737 times
Has Liked: 64 times

Re: the 96 sponsor.....

Post by Hedontplayforyou » Wed May 21, 2025 8:53 pm

8-) The new guy who’s come in from United might have his work cut out already looking for a new shirt sponsor then?

Being Adidas in please , both kit design and sponsor would look great.

dandeclaret
Posts: 4230
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 am
Been Liked: 3036 times
Has Liked: 342 times

Re: the 96 sponsor.....

Post by dandeclaret » Wed May 21, 2025 9:57 pm

JohnMcGreal wrote:
Wed May 21, 2025 8:35 pm
So you do concede that the gambling industry is a bit grubby, then. Just not as bad as other elements of the sport it's sunk its claws into.

I do agree with you on all those things BTW, I just think the gambling lobby is far too powerful and unfortunately has nothing to fear from governments and regulators who are only too happy to keep watching the £ rolling in, regardless of the social costs elsewhere.

It's a shame but there we go. It's not likely to change.
I think there’s a difference between well regulated established bookmakers within the jurisdiction who spend ever increasing amounts on identification and prevention of harm capabilities, and white label overseas bookmakers who ride the market until the regulator catches up with them and forces them to close, like the sponsors in the shirt. You can’t lump them all in together.
This user liked this post: ŽižkovClaret

Post Reply