Neville refused access at Forest

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
turfytopper
Posts: 1369
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:19 am
Been Liked: 435 times
Has Liked: 3588 times
Location: Crawley West Sussex

Re: Neville refused access at Forest

Post by turfytopper » Sat May 24, 2025 5:59 pm

It is a real shame. Forest have been one of the few bright sparks in the Premier League.......

ClaretPete001
Posts: 3262
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2022 11:39 am
Been Liked: 548 times
Has Liked: 189 times

Re: Neville refused access at Forest

Post by ClaretPete001 » Sat May 24, 2025 6:10 pm

KRBFC wrote:
Sat May 24, 2025 4:05 pm
I mean he posted fake news and said Nuno should resign immediately by pushing the narrative Marinakis went on the pitch to confront Nuno because of the draw to Leicester.
It wasn't fake news. I think Neville's point was that Nuno should resign because Marinakis humiliated him...!

I mean it's not impressive punditry because it puts pressure on Nuno to resign but it's not fake news nor does it warrant banning him.

Jakubclaret
Posts: 11009
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1345 times
Has Liked: 896 times

Re: Neville refused access at Forest

Post by Jakubclaret » Sat May 24, 2025 6:54 pm

ClaretPete001 wrote:
Sat May 24, 2025 6:10 pm
It wasn't fake news. I think Neville's point was that Nuno should resign because Marinakis humiliated him...!

I mean it's not impressive punditry because it puts pressure on Nuno to resign but it's not fake news nor does it warrant banning him.
If Neville was remotely serious that's even more concerning thinking that nuno should resign & probably give up any sort of compensation payments & abandon a job on the cusp of europe over something so silly. Neville needs to be asking himself if the boot was on the other foot would he himself be contemplating doing something so foolish.

Stanbill05
Posts: 599
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2020 5:48 pm
Been Liked: 166 times
Has Liked: 59 times

Re: Neville refused access at Forest

Post by Stanbill05 » Sat May 24, 2025 7:47 pm

Jakubclaret wrote:
Sat May 24, 2025 6:54 pm
If Neville was remotely serious that's even more concerning thinking that nuno should resign & probably give up any sort of compensation payments & abandon a job on the cusp of europe over something so silly. Neville needs to be asking himself if the boot was on the other foot would he himself be contemplating doing something so foolish.
They're multi millionaires, not some subservient "Yes Sir" pauper. No-one should be spoken to like that, especially in public. Reflects badly on the both of them. I wouldn't have quit, I'd have told him to **** off and let him sack me. Sky should punish Forest too.
This user liked this post: bobinho

Jakubclaret
Posts: 11009
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1345 times
Has Liked: 896 times

Re: Neville refused access at Forest

Post by Jakubclaret » Sat May 24, 2025 8:10 pm

Stanbill05 wrote:
Sat May 24, 2025 7:47 pm
They're multi millionaires, not some subservient "Yes Sir" pauper. No-one should be spoken to like that, especially in public. Reflects badly on the both of them. I wouldn't have quit, I'd have told him to **** off and let him sack me. Sky should punish Forest too.
We don't know for sure what actually got said & what beef marinakis actually had. The obvious conclusions lead you to the late leicester equaliser. I think nuno handled things pretty well & all of it should have been kept in house. I'm all for pundits offering opinions on football related matters but I feel GN didn't do himself any favours IF the fake news holds any credibility & IF that is true it's understandable why marinakis has stopped GN from entering the city ground.

SydneyClaret
Posts: 212
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 1:19 am
Been Liked: 66 times
Has Liked: 8 times

Re: Neville refused access at Forest

Post by SydneyClaret » Sun May 25, 2025 1:29 am

Just think. If Frank Teasdale had banned Elton Welsby from coming on the Turf we wouldn’t have been able to abuse him. 😂

Vegas Claret
Posts: 34754
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 12670 times
Has Liked: 6311 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Neville refused access at Forest

Post by Vegas Claret » Sun May 25, 2025 5:31 am

I'm sure Marinakis is polite and never gets anything wrong when he confronts refs. The guy is a first class ******
These 2 users liked this post: Poulton-le-Claret Burnley Ace

jollyjack
Posts: 351
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 4:30 pm
Been Liked: 114 times
Has Liked: 20 times

Re: Neville refused access at Forest

Post by jollyjack » Sun May 25, 2025 10:41 am

Does Sky have any minerals? Refuse to broadcast Forest until assured their accreaditation is upheld. Is the VAR tech Sky's property?

Darnhill Claret
Posts: 3149
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:55 pm
Been Liked: 696 times
Has Liked: 2490 times

Re: Neville refused access at Forest

Post by Darnhill Claret » Sun May 25, 2025 10:52 am

I'm sure there is a minimum number of games that have to be broadcast for each club, however it is too late to do anything about 'live games' this season.

Didn't Marinakis state that he is stepping down, due to the possibility of having two clubs in the same competition.
I am presuming that is from next season, and maybe only applies if Forest and Olympiakos end up in the same comp. Not sure.

ClaretPete001
Posts: 3262
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2022 11:39 am
Been Liked: 548 times
Has Liked: 189 times

Re: Neville refused access at Forest

Post by ClaretPete001 » Sun May 25, 2025 11:39 am

Jakubclaret wrote:
Sat May 24, 2025 6:54 pm
If Neville was remotely serious that's even more concerning thinking that nuno should resign & probably give up any sort of compensation payments & abandon a job on the cusp of europe over something so silly. Neville needs to be asking himself if the boot was on the other foot would he himself be contemplating doing something so foolish.
I think Neville was not particularly professional but let's get this into perspective he wasn't tweeting out Nazi propaganda.

In civilised countries we do not ban journalists - it's a bit like burning books it is the thin end of the wedge.

boatshed bill
Posts: 17332
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3561 times
Has Liked: 7810 times

Re: Neville refused access at Forest

Post by boatshed bill » Sun May 25, 2025 12:08 pm

As I see it; no employer should treat their employee like that in public. Good on Neville for highlighting it, though suggesting Nuno should resign is taking it a bit far.

ClaretPete001
Posts: 3262
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2022 11:39 am
Been Liked: 548 times
Has Liked: 189 times

Re: Neville refused access at Forest

Post by ClaretPete001 » Sun May 25, 2025 12:25 pm

boatshed bill wrote:
Sun May 25, 2025 12:08 pm
As I see it; no employer should treat their employee like that in public. Good on Neville for highlighting it, though suggesting Nuno should resign is taking it a bit far.
But you are back in the realms of conjecture and what Jakub calls 'fake news'. None of us know what was said or the nature of the relationship between Nuno and Marinakis.

Private citizens have a right not to have their professional lives commented on by Gary Neville. It's a matter between Nuno and Miranakis. I think Neville can comment on Marinakis's overall behaviour without making personal comments about Nuno who then becomes not only a victim of his boss but also Gary Neville.

Greenmile
Posts: 3313
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2016 8:50 pm
Been Liked: 1155 times
Has Liked: 4523 times

Re: Neville refused access at Forest

Post by Greenmile » Sun May 25, 2025 12:46 pm

ClaretPete001 wrote:
Sun May 25, 2025 12:25 pm
But you are back in the realms of conjecture and what Jakub calls 'fake news'. None of us know what was said or the nature of the relationship between Nuno and Marinakis.

Private citizens have a right not to have their professional lives commented on by Gary Neville. It's a matter between Nuno and Miranakis. I think Neville can comment on Marinakis's overall behaviour without making personal comments about Nuno who then becomes not only a victim of his boss but also Gary Neville.
That would pose something of a problem for sports pundits, commentators, and co-commentators everywhere, unless it’s only Gary Neville that your rule applies to.

daveisaclaret
Posts: 2770
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:23 pm
Been Liked: 1448 times
Has Liked: 104 times
Location: your mum

Re: Neville refused access at Forest

Post by daveisaclaret » Sun May 25, 2025 1:03 pm

If whoever Sky have sent instead has a shred of decency, this will just get a lot more embarrassing for Forest as soon as they come on air today.

ClaretPete001
Posts: 3262
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2022 11:39 am
Been Liked: 548 times
Has Liked: 189 times

Re: Neville refused access at Forest

Post by ClaretPete001 » Sun May 25, 2025 1:05 pm

Greenmile wrote:
Sun May 25, 2025 12:46 pm
That would pose something of a problem for sports pundits, commentators, and co-commentators everywhere, unless it’s only Gary Neville that your rule applies to.
If you can't distinguish between exhorting Nuno to resign and what constitutes professional analysis then we are in trouble.

Most pundits manage the distinction quite well as does Gary Neville. He made an error but who doesn't

Jakubclaret
Posts: 11009
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1345 times
Has Liked: 896 times

Re: Neville refused access at Forest

Post by Jakubclaret » Sun May 25, 2025 1:15 pm

ClaretPete001 wrote:
Sun May 25, 2025 12:25 pm
But you are back in the realms of conjecture and what Jakub calls 'fake news'. None of us know what was said or the nature of the relationship between Nuno and Marinakis.

Private citizens have a right not to have their professional lives commented on by Gary Neville. It's a matter between Nuno and Miranakis. I think Neville can comment on Marinakis's overall behaviour without making personal comments about Nuno who then becomes not only a victim of his boss but also Gary Neville.
The crux for me is that nuno doesn't appear bothered in the slightest about what was allegedly said & for me that should be sufficient enough to suggest it's a storm in a teacup. For some strange inexplicable reason neville has decided to take it upon himself to launch some sort of a crusade when it's not really necessary & it's backfired. I'd rather listen to gary when he's just concentrating on football & not tit for tat irrelevant nonsense.

ClaretPete001
Posts: 3262
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2022 11:39 am
Been Liked: 548 times
Has Liked: 189 times

Re: Neville refused access at Forest

Post by ClaretPete001 » Sun May 25, 2025 1:30 pm

Jakubclaret wrote:
Sun May 25, 2025 1:15 pm
The crux for me is that nuno doesn't appear bothered in the slightest about what was allegedly said & for me that should be sufficient enough to suggest it's a storm in a teacup. For some strange inexplicable reason neville has decided to take it upon himself to launch some sort of a crusade when it's not really necessary & it's backfired. I'd rather listen to gary when he's just concentrating on football & not tit for tat irrelevant nonsense.
I can't comment I'm not a mind reader but it's perfectly possible that Nuno is not bothered but I've met very people who would not have been deeply embarrassed by the initial incident and then Gary Neville's comments.

Greenmile
Posts: 3313
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2016 8:50 pm
Been Liked: 1155 times
Has Liked: 4523 times

Re: Neville refused access at Forest

Post by Greenmile » Sun May 25, 2025 8:04 pm

ClaretPete001 wrote:
Sun May 25, 2025 1:05 pm
If you can't distinguish between exhorting Nuno to resign and what constitutes professional analysis then we are in trouble.

Most pundits manage the distinction quite well as does Gary Neville. He made an error but who doesn't
That’s not what you said though, is it? You said “ Private citizens have a right not to have their professional lives commented on by Gary Neville.”

I was just making the observation that all footballers are private citizens, and they have their professional lives commented on every day by all and sundry.

If you meant “private citizens have a right not to be exhorted to resign by Gary Neville”, you should have said that. You’d still have been wrong though.

boatshed bill
Posts: 17332
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3561 times
Has Liked: 7810 times

Re: Neville refused access at Forest

Post by boatshed bill » Sun May 25, 2025 8:18 pm

ClaretPete001 wrote:
Sun May 25, 2025 12:25 pm
But you are back in the realms of conjecture and what Jakub calls 'fake news'. None of us know what was said or the nature of the relationship between Nuno and Marinakis.

Private citizens have a right not to have their professional lives commented on by Gary Neville. It's a matter between Nuno and Miranakis. I think Neville can comment on Marinakis's overall behaviour without making personal comments about Nuno who then becomes not only a victim of his boss but also Gary Neville.

i thought it was well documented that Marnakis was bollocking Nuno for not immediately subbing Awniyi, and this is what Neville is talking about.
But neville and "Vangelis" do have a bit of history.

ClaretPete001
Posts: 3262
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2022 11:39 am
Been Liked: 548 times
Has Liked: 189 times

Re: Neville refused access at Forest

Post by ClaretPete001 » Sun May 25, 2025 8:42 pm

Greenmile wrote:
Sun May 25, 2025 8:04 pm
That’s not what you said though, is it? You said “ Private citizens have a right not to have their professional lives commented on by Gary Neville.”

I was just making the observation that all footballers are private citizens, and they have their professional lives commented on every day by all and sundry.

If you meant “private citizens have a right not to be exhorted to resign by Gary Neville”, you should have said that. You’d still have been wrong though.
I think you have to differentiate between pundits focusing on the performance of professionals and differentiate that from their professional lives. We all get judged on performance and inter personal relations so in that respect footballers are like everybody else except they suffer it more in public. Saying that teachers also have a lot of public information made available as a group if not so much as a individuals.

Of course, there are discussions about contracts etc but then again teachers and many public servants have their salaries widely publicised and discussed.

I can think of few circumstances where individuals are exhorted to resign publicly or indeed privately. In the end it's a matter of personal ethics. I think Neville crossed the line but you may disagree.

Post Reply