This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
-
Vegas Claret
- Posts: 34427
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12536 times
- Has Liked: 6262 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Post
by Vegas Claret » Thu Jun 05, 2025 11:13 pm
translated:
"Burnley FC, from England, sent a document to the CBF to notify (and complain) about a debt owed by SAF Botafogo in relation to the purchase of the defender Vitinho, who is already with FIFA. The English team is demanding a total of 7.5 million euros (around 48 million reais at the exchange rate of the day) from Alvinegro.
We had access to the document received by the Brazilian football entity. See below:
"We are writing on behalf of Burnley FC to inform them of a dispute with one of their clubs, SAF Botafogo.
Please find attached, for your information, a Proposal from the FIFA General Secretariat in response to Burnley FC's petition."
The CBF's response, on May 22 and signed by Director Enio Gualberto, was as follows:
"Dear sirs,
Thank you for the information provided. We confirm that Botafogo has been notified of the Proposal by the FIFA General Secretariat.
Please do not hesitate to contact us if you require further clarification."
We contacted Botafogo and, to date, have not received a response. If a response is sent, it will be posted here.
Burnley FC has been following the news about Botafogo in recent days, with player sales (Igor Jesus has already been confirmed at Nottingham Forest, and Jair and Cuiabano should follow the same path). Therefore, Burnley has once again demanded from the Rio de Janeiro team"
-
Goliath
- Posts: 3761
- Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2023 10:08 pm
- Been Liked: 709 times
- Has Liked: 275 times
Post
by Goliath » Thu Jun 05, 2025 11:15 pm
Wonder if we do much due diligence on clubs we sell to. In hindsight, it's a big fee from a Brazilian club for any player, nevermind one as average as Vitinho.
-
Swizzlestick
- Posts: 4813
- Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1741 times
- Has Liked: 658 times
Post
by Swizzlestick » Thu Jun 05, 2025 11:26 pm
Goliath wrote: ↑Thu Jun 05, 2025 11:15 pm
Wonder if we do much due diligence on clubs we sell to. In hindsight, it's a big fee from a Brazilian club for any player, nevermind one as average as Vitinho.
They have a billionaire owner. Same guy who co-owns Palace. It’s not Big Steve down the pub.
-
FeedTheArf
- Posts: 1463
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:15 am
- Been Liked: 436 times
- Has Liked: 178 times
Post
by FeedTheArf » Thu Jun 05, 2025 11:45 pm
Wonder what happens in this situation? Transfer embargo? I don’t suppose there’s an instance in which Vitinho (or his registration at least) comes back to us?
-
Woodleyclaret
- Posts: 8507
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1843 times
- Has Liked: 2186 times
Post
by Woodleyclaret » Fri Jun 06, 2025 5:58 am
I'd have him back tomorrow he would be an excellent squad player.
-
GetIntoEm
- Posts: 2810
- Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2022 12:17 pm
- Been Liked: 754 times
- Has Liked: 220 times
Post
by GetIntoEm » Fri Jun 06, 2025 7:39 am
Bring him back if they don't want to pay. Loved vitinho
-
Goliath
- Posts: 3761
- Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2023 10:08 pm
- Been Liked: 709 times
- Has Liked: 275 times
Post
by Goliath » Fri Jun 06, 2025 8:36 am
Woodleyclaret wrote: ↑Fri Jun 06, 2025 5:58 am
I'd have him back tomorrow he would be an excellent squad player.

-
Rowls
- Posts: 14648
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5644 times
- Has Liked: 5864 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Post
by Rowls » Fri Jun 06, 2025 8:37 am
Swizzlestick wrote: ↑Thu Jun 05, 2025 11:26 pm
It’s not Big Steve down the pub.
Big Steve owes me a fiver. Tell him if you see him.
-
dougcollins
- Posts: 9142
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
- Been Liked: 2371 times
- Has Liked: 2343 times
- Location: Yarkshire
Post
by dougcollins » Fri Jun 06, 2025 9:01 am
Rowls wrote: ↑Fri Jun 06, 2025 8:37 am
Big Steve owes me a fiver. Tell him if you see him.
He won't be happy about that.
-
JR1882
- Posts: 930
- Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2016 10:08 am
- Been Liked: 283 times
Post
by JR1882 » Fri Jun 06, 2025 9:25 am
Swizzlestick wrote: ↑Thu Jun 05, 2025 11:26 pm
They have a billionaire owner. Same guy who co-owns Palace. It’s not Big Steve down the pub.
And Lyon - who have massive form for this kind of thing.
-
aggi
- Posts: 9653
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
- Been Liked: 2319 times
Post
by aggi » Fri Jun 06, 2025 10:09 am
Swizzlestick wrote: ↑Thu Jun 05, 2025 11:26 pm
They have a billionaire owner. Same guy who co-owns Palace. It’s not Big Steve down the pub.
Also a risk that Palace won't be able to play in Europe as he's currently breaching the multi-club ownership rules.
-
quoonbeatz
- Posts: 5233
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
- Been Liked: 2943 times
- Has Liked: 829 times
Post
by quoonbeatz » Fri Jun 06, 2025 10:13 am
aggi wrote: ↑Fri Jun 06, 2025 10:09 am
Also a risk that Palace won't be able to play in Europe as he's currently breaching the multi-club ownership rules.
Absolutely brilliant if that happens.
-
burnley007
- Posts: 4173
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:49 am
- Been Liked: 952 times
- Has Liked: 786 times
Post
by burnley007 » Fri Jun 06, 2025 10:21 am
quoonbeatz wrote: ↑Fri Jun 06, 2025 10:13 am
Absolutely brilliant if that happens.
But totally unfair on the fans who are looking forward to the adventure. Imagine if we'd had it taken away from us, I would have been gutted but my son, it would have broken his heart!
-
aggi
- Posts: 9653
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
- Been Liked: 2319 times
Post
by aggi » Fri Jun 06, 2025 10:22 am
burnley007 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 06, 2025 10:21 am
But totally unfair on the fans who are looking forward to the adventure. Imagine if we'd had it taken away from us, I would have been gutted but my son, it would have broken his heart!
Even worse for the Palace fans their place would probably go to Brighton!
This user liked this post: Darnhill Claret
-
Darnhill Claret
- Posts: 3043
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:55 pm
- Been Liked: 658 times
- Has Liked: 2274 times
Post
by Darnhill Claret » Fri Jun 06, 2025 10:37 am
As far as Vitinho goes, he's the sort of player who needs a run of games to raise his levels. Always looked better the more he played. Felt that he grew into the right wing back role better than others.
Yes, I know that would apply to lots of players, but in Vitinho's case, I felt it took him a while to get going again after time out.
-
Spijed
- Posts: 17932
- Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
- Been Liked: 3028 times
- Has Liked: 1324 times
Post
by Spijed » Fri Jun 06, 2025 10:51 am
aggi wrote: ↑Fri Jun 06, 2025 10:09 am
Also a risk that Palace won't be able to play in Europe as he's currently breaching the multi-club ownership rules.
How are they at risk whilst Forest aren't?
-
Swizzlestick
- Posts: 4813
- Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1741 times
- Has Liked: 658 times
Post
by Swizzlestick » Fri Jun 06, 2025 10:59 am
Spijed wrote: ↑Fri Jun 06, 2025 10:51 am
How are they at risk whilst Forest aren't?
The Greek lad doesn't technically own Forest now i believe - think he transferred to a trust.
-
ClaretTony
- Posts: 76635
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37345 times
- Has Liked: 5702 times
- Location: Burnley
-
Contact:
Post
by ClaretTony » Fri Jun 06, 2025 11:09 am
aggi wrote: ↑Fri Jun 06, 2025 10:09 am
Also a risk that Palace won't be able to play in Europe as he's currently breaching the multi-club ownership rules.
I think they will ultimately get round it but it would be good news if they didn't. Someone has to have the balls to put a stop to this.
-
ClaretTony
- Posts: 76635
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37345 times
- Has Liked: 5702 times
- Location: Burnley
-
Contact:
Post
by ClaretTony » Fri Jun 06, 2025 11:11 am
Spijed wrote: ↑Fri Jun 06, 2025 10:51 am
How are they at risk whilst Forest aren't?
Marinakis has stood down as owner but I think they'd have been OK because Olympiacos and Forest are in two different competitions.
-
aggi
- Posts: 9653
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
- Been Liked: 2319 times
Post
by aggi » Fri Jun 06, 2025 11:21 am
Spijed wrote: ↑Fri Jun 06, 2025 10:51 am
How are they at risk whilst Forest aren't?
Ownership of Forest has been transferred to a blind trust. In theory Marinakis is still the owner of the assets but has no say on the running of the club ...
-
quoonbeatz
- Posts: 5233
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
- Been Liked: 2943 times
- Has Liked: 829 times
Post
by quoonbeatz » Fri Jun 06, 2025 1:00 pm
burnley007 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 06, 2025 10:21 am
But totally unfair on the fans who are looking forward to the adventure. Imagine if we'd had it taken away from us, I would have been gutted but my son, it would have broken his heart!
Can’t say I’m arsed about them tbh. Multi-club ownership should be banned so someone finally falling foul of it is a good thing.
These 2 users liked this post: Woodleyclaret Buxtonclaret
-
Clarets4me
- Posts: 5426
- Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 9:31 pm
- Been Liked: 2589 times
- Has Liked: 1108 times
- Location: Ightenhill,Burnley
Post
by Clarets4me » Fri Jun 06, 2025 1:12 pm
aggi wrote: ↑Fri Jun 06, 2025 11:21 am
Ownership of Forest has been transferred to a blind trust. In theory Marinakis is still the owner of the assets but has no say on the running of the club ...
In that case, can they arrest the a***hole next time he comes on the pitch after a game, and give him a lifelong stadium ban ?
-
CyrilEbokiPoh
- Posts: 564
- Joined: Fri May 30, 2025 11:13 am
- Been Liked: 176 times
- Has Liked: 35 times
Post
by CyrilEbokiPoh » Fri Jun 06, 2025 1:26 pm
Can we have him back? (Serious question!)
This user liked this post: Woodleyclaret
-
ClaretTony
- Posts: 76635
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37345 times
- Has Liked: 5702 times
- Location: Burnley
-
Contact:
Post
by ClaretTony » Fri Jun 06, 2025 1:41 pm
quoonbeatz wrote: ↑Fri Jun 06, 2025 1:00 pm
Can’t say I’m arsed about them tbh. Multi-club ownership should be banned so someone finally falling foul of it is a good thing.
Totally agree with you
-
Chester Perry
- Posts: 20133
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
- Been Liked: 3296 times
- Has Liked: 481 times
Post
by Chester Perry » Fri Jun 06, 2025 3:47 pm
aggi wrote: ↑Fri Jun 06, 2025 11:21 am
Ownership of Forest has been transferred to a blind trust. In theory Marinakis is still the owner of the assets but has no say on the running of the club ...
Palace could have done this but the closing date of eligibility for next season was March 1st 2025 - Palace have missed that deadline because back then they did not know/expect/believe they would qualify even in the FA Cup
Of course Palace have two owners involved in separate multi-club operations - they could be out of the Europa League because of Textor, but also do not qualify for the Europa Conference because of Blitzer
I suspect that the ECA will come up with a solution, simply because a number of it's most prominent members will demand it - but this was a problem that FIFA/UEFA opened the door to with their desire to see more cash coming through
-
Corway
- Posts: 192
- Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2023 6:39 pm
- Been Liked: 23 times
- Has Liked: 4 times
Post
by Corway » Fri Jun 06, 2025 8:18 pm
Burnley are apparently demanding Botafogo pay €7.5m for the 25-year-old’s transfer.
He left last October for an undisclosed fee.
Nottingham Forest wanting to sign Igor Jesus, Jair and Cuiabano, so Burnley have again asked Botafogo about the unpaid fee, aware they will get a financial windfall.
-
Bow
- Posts: 234
- Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2024 8:15 pm
- Been Liked: 117 times
- Has Liked: 2 times
Post
by Bow » Fri Jun 06, 2025 8:24 pm
The multi club ownership thing is absolutely ridiculous and makes a mockery of the sport. How it ever got to be allowed is beyond me.
-
ecc
- Posts: 6104
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:08 am
- Been Liked: 2090 times
- Has Liked: 1709 times
Post
by ecc » Fri Jun 06, 2025 8:28 pm
Swizzlestick wrote: ↑Thu Jun 05, 2025 11:26 pm
They have a billionaire owner. Same guy who co-owns Palace. It’s not Big Steve down the pub.
LOL
-
bobinho
- Posts: 10576
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:48 pm
- Been Liked: 4612 times
- Has Liked: 7256 times
- Location: Burnley
Post
by bobinho » Fri Jun 06, 2025 8:29 pm
Yes. It’s all in the other Vitinho thread…
-
Jakubs Tash
- Posts: 3154
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 811 times
- Has Liked: 284 times
Post
by Jakubs Tash » Sat Jun 07, 2025 2:27 am
Botafogo still very much financially active in the market. It’s a bit of a **** take if they still owe us money as reports suggest….

- IMG_4662.jpeg (715.2 KiB) Viewed 1151 times
-
JR1882
- Posts: 930
- Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2016 10:08 am
- Been Liked: 283 times
Post
by JR1882 » Sat Jun 07, 2025 9:38 am
aggi wrote: ↑Fri Jun 06, 2025 11:21 am
Ownership of Forest has been transferred to a blind trust. In theory Marinakis is still the owner of the assets but has no say on the running of the club ...
Which is definitely the case, absolutely no say whatsoever

This user liked this post: Darnhill Claret