Robert snodgrass
-
- Posts: 2065
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 10:21 pm
- Been Liked: 217 times
- Has Liked: 97 times
Robert snodgrass
http://www.football.london/west-ham-uni ... m-13254956" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; the mirror say were lining up a bid for him . Whats everyones opinions on him ?
Re: Robert snodgrass
Not another left footer
-
- Posts: 3741
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:53 am
- Been Liked: 1694 times
- Has Liked: 193 times
- Location: Got a ticket from a mashed up bloke in Camden Town
Re: Robert snodgrass
If as the report says they would take a hit on the 10m they paid he would be worth looking at, if they fancy making a profit on him I think he will still be there at the end of August. Never seem to have a bad game when I saw him play for Hull but his few games I have seen at West Ham he was invisible.
Re: Robert snodgrass
At £50k a week, he could just about be within our wage budgets assuming they have moved up a bit again.
Re: Robert snodgrass
Snodgrass is definitely worth a look as a replacement for Boyd surely? If we can get him for anywhere around £8 million he'd be decent business. West Ham don't really play to his strengths like Hull did, but I think he'd be suited to us nicely. Along with Brady, his set piece delivery would give us real threat and would hopefully see an end to Arfield taking any corners or free kicks!! A midfield 4 of Brady, Westwood, Hendrick and Snodgrass wouldn't be too bad you know.
This user liked this post: boatshed bill
Re: Robert snodgrass
Quality player.
West Ham was always a strange move for him (money probably) and them (not what they needed).
Whilst I rate him and think he would be a decent signing, £10m for a 29 year old is pushing it for a club like ours. I'm all for us spending 10 to 20 million on a player or two, but they would ideally be ones that we have a chance to turn a good profit on - young, hungry, good character and talented.
I'm hoping that Butterfield has his eyes firmly on this sort of player from Europe.
West Ham was always a strange move for him (money probably) and them (not what they needed).
Whilst I rate him and think he would be a decent signing, £10m for a 29 year old is pushing it for a club like ours. I'm all for us spending 10 to 20 million on a player or two, but they would ideally be ones that we have a chance to turn a good profit on - young, hungry, good character and talented.
I'm hoping that Butterfield has his eyes firmly on this sort of player from Europe.
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: Robert snodgrass
Didn't SD say things along the lines of "he's motivated by other things" when we had the bid accepted in Jan?
Not sure he'd be interested if that was the case
Not sure he'd be interested if that was the case
This user liked this post: Tribesmen
-
- Posts: 19506
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
- Been Liked: 4300 times
- Has Liked: 8520 times
- Location: Derbyshire
Re: Robert snodgrass
Never seen him have a bad game for Hull either. Though admit I've not watched them that much.
As a replacement for George, yes please!
If the price is right, of course.
As a replacement for George, yes please!
If the price is right, of course.
-
- Posts: 9064
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
- Been Liked: 3429 times
- Has Liked: 5646 times
- Location: Catterick N.Yorks
Re: Robert snodgrass
He chose West Ham over us. I know it didn't work out for him but we've moved on. So should he.
We've bigger priorities than another winger, especially if Taylor signs next Monday.
We've bigger priorities than another winger, especially if Taylor signs next Monday.
-
- Posts: 5639
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:15 am
- Been Liked: 1292 times
- Has Liked: 691 times
- Location: Tibet
Re: Robert snodgrass
Nail on the head LC , money ......................Lancasterclaret wrote:Didn't SD say things along the lines of "he's motivated by other things" when we had the bid accepted in Jan?
Not sure he'd be interested if that was the case
-
- Posts: 5069
- Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 3:14 pm
- Been Liked: 1157 times
- Has Liked: 496 times
Re: Robert snodgrass
Looking at him I'd say it was more Buckfast than money
Re: Robert snodgrass
Wing should be pretty high on the priority. I'd hope so at least.Colburn_Claret wrote:He chose West Ham over us. I know it didn't work out for him but we've moved on. So should he.
We've bigger priorities than another winger, especially if Taylor signs next Monday.
-
- Posts: 3155
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 811 times
- Has Liked: 284 times
Re: Robert snodgrass
Good player. I would certainly be interested if, as mentioned above, we could steal him. Not interested at £10m + big wages.
Interestingly, saw some stats on Snodgrass last season and he was right up there for ground covered/hard work so his work rate can't be questioned and he has a bit more ability on the ball than other options we have been relying on over the last couple of years.
Whilst he's not slow he isn't particularly quick either. I would like to see us add some pace in wide areas which will help with ball retention and playing on the break away from home.
Interestingly, saw some stats on Snodgrass last season and he was right up there for ground covered/hard work so his work rate can't be questioned and he has a bit more ability on the ball than other options we have been relying on over the last couple of years.
Whilst he's not slow he isn't particularly quick either. I would like to see us add some pace in wide areas which will help with ball retention and playing on the break away from home.
Re: Robert snodgrass
Apart from the money, he probably chose WHU because he thought they had more chance of remaining in the league than we did...cant really blame him for that. Quality player though, would love to see him here.
-
- Posts: 4581
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:43 am
- Been Liked: 1540 times
- Has Liked: 1059 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Robert snodgrass
Not sure about that myself. We have two very good wingers IMO with a decent back-up in Arfield (if he stays). I would suggest a new CB, RB, CM and (goal scoring) CF would all be more of a priority than a winger, unless the right one becomes available at the right price (which IMO Snodgrass isn't).DCWat wrote:Wing should be pretty high on the priority. I'd hope so at least.
-
- Posts: 12966
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
- Been Liked: 5499 times
- Has Liked: 961 times
Re: Robert snodgrass
If youre classing JBG as one of the two very good wingers then youre being a bit hopeful as whilst he looks like a good footballer and has shown glimpses of real talent he has not nearly played enough for us and at this level to say he will be a very good Premier League wingerGoobs wrote:Not sure about that myself. We have two very good wingers IMO with a decent back-up in Arfield (if he stays).
Getting Snodgrass and having a player like JBG as your 3rd choice pushing the other two is exactly where we should be heading and would be a real sign that Dyche is taking this club forward and up yet another level
This user liked this post: DCWat
-
- Posts: 12966
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
- Been Liked: 5499 times
- Has Liked: 961 times
Re: Robert snodgrass
Yes we should move on and not care about the fact he chose West Ham over us and now make a decision on whether signing him this summer would be a good move for our clubColburn_Claret wrote:He chose West Ham over us. I know it didn't work out for him but we've moved on. So should he.
We've bigger priorities than another winger, especially if Taylor signs next Monday.
This user liked this post: FactualFrank
-
- Posts: 4400
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:09 pm
- Been Liked: 1843 times
- Has Liked: 933 times
Re: Robert snodgrass
An excellent player for many years at Hull, never quite seemed to fit at WHU but there's still a quality player underneath.
Might put the wind up Brady a bit who seemed to be second on the list when we lost out on Snodgrass in January.
Brady also seemed to be our key set piece taker which I'd put Snodgrass straight on If he came.
His free kicks literally picked up points for Hull, like that bl**dy 94th min equalizer...
Might put the wind up Brady a bit who seemed to be second on the list when we lost out on Snodgrass in January.
Brady also seemed to be our key set piece taker which I'd put Snodgrass straight on If he came.
His free kicks literally picked up points for Hull, like that bl**dy 94th min equalizer...
Re: Robert snodgrass
would like to see him here, but like most other rumours not getting excited yet bit like Walters, we will probably be offering less than the 10MM so will also depend if WH are prepared to let him go for what we offer.
Re: Robert snodgrass
£8M and £40-50k p/w is about as expensive as we'd be able to go I imagine and I'd rather our marquee signings were ones we've got a chance of bringing on a bit and making a profit on - I was one of the ones preferring Brady to Snodgrass in January. But Snodgrass is class and I could see him winning us games cutting inside from the right. Yeah get him, we got loadsa money now.
-
- Posts: 917
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:50 am
- Been Liked: 437 times
- Has Liked: 482 times
Re: Robert snodgrass
With Brady and Snodgrass we would have the most creative wingers playing together since Morley and Cochrane.
That really is a mouth watering prospect.
That really is a mouth watering prospect.
-
- Posts: 8240
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
- Been Liked: 4125 times
- Has Liked: 1134 times
- Location: Chesterfield
Re: Robert snodgrass
Would have been an outstanding signing in January, even moreso now as it will be cheaper.
Yes please.
Yes please.
This user liked this post: tim_noone
Re: Robert snodgrass
I think he's way over the top of our wage structure (Brady thought to be our current highest on around £35k)
Would like to see us dig deep for a marquee signing but, for me, Snodgrass does not come into that bracket
Would like to see us dig deep for a marquee signing but, for me, Snodgrass does not come into that bracket
-
- Posts: 1325
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:24 pm
- Been Liked: 514 times
- Has Liked: 89 times
- Location: On a galloping horse with a blind man
Re: Robert snodgrass
Regardless of age, foot etc I believe that - potentially one year on from promotion:
Snodgrass + JBG + Brady > Boyd + Arfield + Kightly
Its a yes from me
Snodgrass + JBG + Brady > Boyd + Arfield + Kightly
Its a yes from me
Re: Robert snodgrass
If we can get him for less than the £10m we were ready to pay in January, and his wages fit our structure, then I'd be happy with Snodgrass. He's not had a good spell at West Ham, but he's got bags of quality and would certainly add value to us.
Another one to look at could potentially be Enner Valencia, who West Ham are also willing to let go. Again there are doubts about whether he'd fit our budget though.
Another one to look at could potentially be Enner Valencia, who West Ham are also willing to let go. Again there are doubts about whether he'd fit our budget though.
-
- Posts: 5904
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 pm
- Been Liked: 788 times
- Has Liked: 511 times
- Location: Devon
Re: Robert snodgrass
Definetly no.
-
- Posts: 20133
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
- Been Liked: 3296 times
- Has Liked: 481 times
Re: Robert snodgrass
Good
-
- Posts: 2105
- Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 9:28 pm
- Been Liked: 492 times
- Has Liked: 411 times
Re: Robert snodgrass
People are happy to pay £3m for a crap forward who doesn't score many goals and is nearly 34 yet are moaning about the prospect of a genuinely good player who is 29.
Where does your logic come from. Smh
Where does your logic come from. Smh
-
- Posts: 9064
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
- Been Liked: 3429 times
- Has Liked: 5646 times
- Location: Catterick N.Yorks
Re: Robert snodgrass
We bought Brady because he chose West Ham, or do you think we would have bought them both.Devils_Advocate wrote:Yes we should move on and not care about the fact he chose West Ham over us and now make a decision on whether signing him this summer would be a good move for our club
I'm happy having JBG on one wing, Taylor on the other, Brady who can play either and Scotty as cover for all 3.
It's not that Snodgrass is no good, but if/when Keane moves on, and even if AG stays, I still think we need to be spending our money on other priorities.
-
- Posts: 4396
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:00 am
- Been Liked: 1619 times
- Has Liked: 694 times
Re: Robert snodgrass
I think he would be a good signing. Always seems to cause problems when laying against us.
Re: Robert snodgrass
He's more interested in money than playing. No thanks.
Re: Robert snodgrass
How confident are you that Taylor's coming to play on the wing? Far as I know (I hear a lot about Leeds from mates) he's not played as a winger.Colburn_Claret wrote:I'm happy having JBG on one wing, Taylor on the other, Brady who can play either and Scotty as cover for all 3.
-
- Posts: 1551
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:35 pm
- Been Liked: 453 times
- Has Liked: 2275 times
- Location: Wantage
Re: Robert snodgrass
Taylors a LB surely?
-
- Posts: 9064
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
- Been Liked: 3429 times
- Has Liked: 5646 times
- Location: Catterick N.Yorks
Re: Robert snodgrass
He's an attacking left back, with a good delivery.lucs86 wrote:How confident are you that Taylor's coming to play on the wing? Far as I know (I hear a lot about Leeds from mates) he's not played as a winger.
SD's preference is to have his wingers play as extra defenders. So far we've had wingers (Boyd and Arfield) converted into extra fullbacks, I think he would like to try a natural defender, and turn him into a winger.
Only my opinion mind, but playing Taylor in front of Ward, and not replacing him, is the way he's going.
-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 937 times
Re: Robert snodgrass
Isn't Snodgrass one of those players we need to sign so he doesn't play against us?
(like Nugent and a few others)
(like Nugent and a few others)
This user liked this post: tim_noone
Re: Robert snodgrass
We've never played with wingers under Dyche, Wingers are forwards. Boyd and Arfield have been used as wide midfielders. And if they've been converted to/from anything, its to wide midfielders from attacking and center mid, respectively.Colburn_Claret wrote:He's an attacking left back, with a good delivery.
SD's preference is to have his wingers play as extra defenders. So far we've had wingers (Boyd and Arfield) converted into extra fullbacks, I think he would like to try a natural defender, and turn him into a winger.
Only my opinion mind, but playing Taylor in front of Ward, and not replacing him, is the way he's going.
This user liked this post: bfcmik
-
- Posts: 19506
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
- Been Liked: 4300 times
- Has Liked: 8520 times
- Location: Derbyshire
Re: Robert snodgrass
Hipper wrote:Isn't Snodgrass one of those players we need to sign so he doesn't play against us?
(like Nugent and a few others)
That's just plain cynical!

-
- Posts: 1802
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 507 times
- Has Liked: 173 times
Re: Robert snodgrass
Not for me. We had a narrow escape when he chose WHU.
Re: Robert snodgrass
I'm not sure Snodgrass hasn't peaked, so to speak and would need to recover his form
from his days at Hull. Don't see him wanting to drop in wages and don't see us
wanting to shell out 50k a week either.
So a 'no-no' for me althuogh would be happy to be proved wrong.
from his days at Hull. Don't see him wanting to drop in wages and don't see us
wanting to shell out 50k a week either.
So a 'no-no' for me althuogh would be happy to be proved wrong.
-
- Posts: 12966
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
- Been Liked: 5499 times
- Has Liked: 961 times
Re: Robert snodgrass
I wasnt disagreeing there may be other reasons why we shouldnt sign Snodgrass but didnt see what him choosing West Ham last Jan has to do with our decision this summerColburn_Claret wrote:We bought Brady because he chose West Ham, or do you think we would have bought them both.
I'm happy having JBG on one wing, Taylor on the other, Brady who can play either and Scotty as cover for all 3.
It's not that Snodgrass is no good, but if/when Keane moves on, and even if AG stays, I still think we need to be spending our money on other priorities.
This user liked this post: Colburn_Claret
-
- Posts: 4400
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:09 pm
- Been Liked: 1843 times
- Has Liked: 933 times
Re: Robert snodgrass
Those long forgotten days and his peak being all the way back in... January?jurek wrote:I'm not sure Snodgrass hasn't peaked, so to speak and would need to recover his form
from his days at Hull.
He was great for Hull up until the day he left, 2 goals and an assist in his last 5 games. Then spent four months at West Ham where it never really clicked.
I'd be amazed If he'd suddenly forgotten how to be a good footballer in four months. More likely he didn't fit in the new team he was playing for.
-
- Posts: 15478
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
- Been Liked: 3548 times
- Has Liked: 5594 times
- Location: Oxfordshire
Re: Robert snodgrass
It's Burnley, some of our fans like to change a players position.lucs86 wrote:How confident are you that Taylor's coming to play on the wing? Far as I know (I hear a lot about Leeds from mates) he's not played as a winger.
See Darikwa, Trippier and Tarks for previous examples.
These 3 users liked this post: FactualFrank ClaretTony JPS71
-
- Posts: 2105
- Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 9:28 pm
- Been Liked: 492 times
- Has Liked: 411 times
Re: Robert snodgrass
See I think ablue has missed a trick here, deploying Tarkowski on the wing could be a stroke of genius. He'd have that defensive acumen Dyche craves and his height would be useful from preventing overhit passes sailing harmlessly out of play. He has that Arfield ability of running with the ball into trouble and losing it.Sidney1st wrote:It's Burnley, some of our fans like to change a players position.
See Darikwa, Trippier and Tarks for previous examples.
Up your game ablue defensive mid was so 2015
This user liked this post: Sidney1st
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Robert snodgrass
I remember one poster suggest Hennings in central midfield.Sidney1st wrote:It's Burnley, some of our fans like to change a players position.
See Darikwa, Trippier and Tarks for previous examples.
This user liked this post: Sidney1st
-
- Posts: 15478
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
- Been Liked: 3548 times
- Has Liked: 5594 times
- Location: Oxfordshire
Re: Robert snodgrass
I didn't see that one Frank.
-
- Posts: 76640
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37346 times
- Has Liked: 5703 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Robert snodgrass
Neither did HenningsSidney1st wrote:I didn't see that one Frank.

These 2 users liked this post: Sidney1st FactualFrank
-
- Posts: 9064
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
- Been Liked: 3429 times
- Has Liked: 5646 times
- Location: Catterick N.Yorks
Re: Robert snodgrass
A bit pedantic but I don't disagree, only what I said still stands, maybe he wants to see his wide midfielders get past a man and deliver a cross, as well as defend as strong as Arfield and Boyd.Newty wrote:We've never played with wingers under Dyche, Wingers are forwards. Boyd and Arfield have been used as wide midfielders. And if they've been converted to/from anything, its to wide midfielders from attacking and center mid, respectively.
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: Robert snodgrass
Would love us to get Snodgrass.
When there was talk of him brady and snodgrass.
Preference for here and now was him or grosicki. With long term preference brady.
Would be delighted if we ended up with two of them.
When there was talk of him brady and snodgrass.
Preference for here and now was him or grosicki. With long term preference brady.
Would be delighted if we ended up with two of them.
This user liked this post: burnmark
-
- Posts: 2551
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 5:29 pm
- Been Liked: 605 times
- Has Liked: 346 times
- Location: Hertfordshire
Re: Robert snodgrass
sign him up; unless SD knows better.....