Why Gray isn't a big loss.
Why Gray isn't a big loss.
Gray was awesome in the Championship but for me has been found lacking in the Prem.
Here are some facts.
He only scored in 6 games.
Only "important" goal was the winner against Middlesborough. (Not counting Sunderland as we would have beat them anyway)
We can replace him with much better for less. E.g. Wilfred Bony is available @£13m and is still only 28.
Good luck to him but we have literally robbed Watford of £18.5m.
His first touch has got even worse than when we signed him!!
He doesn't score enough to build a team around. Vokes scored more and contributes far more to the team. Barnes also.
UTC.
Here are some facts.
He only scored in 6 games.
Only "important" goal was the winner against Middlesborough. (Not counting Sunderland as we would have beat them anyway)
We can replace him with much better for less. E.g. Wilfred Bony is available @£13m and is still only 28.
Good luck to him but we have literally robbed Watford of £18.5m.
His first touch has got even worse than when we signed him!!
He doesn't score enough to build a team around. Vokes scored more and contributes far more to the team. Barnes also.
UTC.
This user liked this post: Claret-On-A-T-Rex
-
- Posts: 15478
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
- Been Liked: 3548 times
- Has Liked: 5594 times
- Location: Oxfordshire
Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.
Considering the promotion he helped fire us too, we got an excellent return for our initial investment.
These 5 users liked this post: ontario claret Leisure Claret-On-A-T-Rex Buxtonclaret FulledgeClaret
-
- Posts: 13046
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1920 times
- Has Liked: 383 times
Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.
A country mile our best striker.
His game was not all about goals. All season we looked a much better attacking threat when he played.
Plus the service he got was worse than laughable at times
His game was not all about goals. All season we looked a much better attacking threat when he played.
Plus the service he got was worse than laughable at times
These 2 users liked this post: Top Claret 3putt
-
- Posts: 7949
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 4:06 pm
- Been Liked: 1196 times
- Has Liked: 245 times
Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.
Makes you wonder why BFC offered Gray a substantially improved new contract when he cannot control a ball and is such a poor finisher.
This user liked this post: JohnMac
-
- Posts: 1851
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 5:41 pm
- Been Liked: 551 times
- Has Liked: 407 times
- Location: Malabo, EG/Chester
- Contact:
Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.
I'm sad to see him go. He was not the finished article for sure but I just hoped he would stay a bit longer and perhaps become the 20 goal Prem striker that he may become, with the Clarets.
Such is life.
Such is life.
These 3 users liked this post: Dodobdobodobo LoveCurryPies Woodleyclaret
-
- Posts: 5243
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 1:18 pm
- Been Liked: 2124 times
- Has Liked: 419 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.
Bony at 13 mil would be a brilliant bit of business - even at higher wages it would equate to a swap of Gray for Bony.
This user liked this post: tim_noone
Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.
His game was all about goals.Newcastleclaret93 wrote:A country mile our best striker.
His game was not all about goals. All season we looked a much better attacking threat when he played.
Plus the service he got was worse than laughable at times
If he could hold the ball up and create I would think differently.
Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.
He's a big loss and we would have much preferred to keep him. But he wanted to go for whatever reason. And there are probably a few good reasons for him. We're changing our style and we will adapt. Players will be coming in.
Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.
He's a big loss and we would have much preferred to keep him. But he wanted to go for whatever reason. And there are probably a few good reasons for him. We're changing our style and we will adapt. Players will be coming in.
Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.
Bony is not available for 13m. Where do you get this garbage?
-
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
- Been Liked: 403 times
- Has Liked: 50 times
Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.
Gray is a big loss, Walters is going to have to be a revelation.
Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.
All over the news. Swansea offered £10m and told to pay another £3m.Saxoman wrote:Bony is not available for 13m. Where do you get this garbage?
-
- Posts: 7949
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 4:06 pm
- Been Liked: 1196 times
- Has Liked: 245 times
Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.
Bony is available for £17.5 million according to Pep on Talksport.
Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.
Twitter news? I look on BBC, I see nothing.Dejavu wrote:All over the news. Swansea offered £10m and told to pay another £3m.
-
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 11:22 am
- Been Liked: 20 times
- Has Liked: 14 times
Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.
Will be a huge loss to us next season
But Dyche will have known that a departure was inevitable. And surely has others in mind
Keep the faith
But Dyche will have known that a departure was inevitable. And surely has others in mind
Keep the faith
Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.
Barnes contributes more
are you fkn stupid? He scored 9 goals in a hoofball defensive side, how many penalties? I know Vokes scored 1 at Soton. His Sunderland hattrick wasn't important because we "would've beat them anyway" Lmaoooooooo

-
- Posts: 5125
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:50 am
- Been Liked: 1127 times
- Has Liked: 1238 times
Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.
Watford have got a bargain with Gray. 18 million is jack **** in this market. Has I have said before Gray is wip and he will play at the very highest level.
-
- Posts: 8729
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:50 pm
- Been Liked: 3114 times
- Has Liked: 2155 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.
He's that good, he's gone to Watford for crying out loud.
Not much of a step up, if any. More money probably and nearer the bright lights of London.
Will be interesting to see how he performs over the season, but I think we have robbed Watford
blind on this deal - well done the board. I don't think he really wanted to be here in the first
instance TBH.
Just my opinion mind.
Not much of a step up, if any. More money probably and nearer the bright lights of London.
Will be interesting to see how he performs over the season, but I think we have robbed Watford
blind on this deal - well done the board. I don't think he really wanted to be here in the first
instance TBH.
Just my opinion mind.
This user liked this post: Woodleyclaret
Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.
Widely reported that City want £13m for Bony. Not that we could meet his wage demands mind.
Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.
Bony is better? Based on what? Did he even score for Stoke last year?
Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.
Can't see you signing bony, as 1 his wages, 2 his age, no resale value and 3, he wouldn't sign for you IMO.
If he doesn't sign for swans, my feeling is he'll return to France.
If he doesn't sign for swans, my feeling is he'll return to France.
-
- Posts: 8831
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:22 pm
- Been Liked: 3017 times
- Has Liked: 1860 times
Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.
he is a big loss when the other available strikers are at best average, not exactly prolific to say the least.Dejavu wrote:Gray was awesome in the Championship but for me has been found lacking in the Prem.
Here are some facts.
He only scored in 6 games.
Only "important" goal was the winner against Middlesborough. (Not counting Sunderland as we would have beat them anyway)
We can replace him with much better for less. E.g. Wilfred Bony is available @£13m and is still only 28.
Good luck to him but we have literally robbed Watford of £18.5m.
His first touch has got even worse than when we signed him!!
He doesn't score enough to build a team around. Vokes scored more and contributes far more to the team. Barnes also.
UTC.
Bit of a mystery why so many jump aboard this "first touch " nonsense , it just isnt the case.
With better support, who knows what he might have been capable of.
Burnley won once away, the meagre points tally was down to us being strugglers. Not much chance of matching Harry Kane if you play for a bottom end side.
-
- Posts: 5125
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:50 am
- Been Liked: 1127 times
- Has Liked: 1238 times
Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.
Bony is not fit to lace Andras boots. He is overrated and over paid. One good season at Swansea and that his lot. All these Gray bashers would not recognise quality if it was swinging from their bell end
This user liked this post: joey13
Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.
Gray will be missed but his first touch certainly has plenty of room for improvement. Anybody who watches regularly could surely see that.
Last edited by taio on Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.
Bony who's on 100k a week , FFS
-
- Posts: 6382
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 3160 times
- Has Liked: 148 times
Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.
Gray is a big loss. The very premise of the thread is nonsense.
Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.
If Swansea can afford him so can we. Anyway, I was only using him as an example of what is available.joey13 wrote:Bony who's on 100k a week , FFS
This user liked this post: tim_noone
-
- Posts: 821
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:34 pm
- Been Liked: 405 times
- Has Liked: 182 times
- Location: Rawtenstall
Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.
Gray seems to be getting better and better as the night goes on and more and more of the moaners join the game.Dont remember him scoring many high scores on player ratings last year.Perhaps against Sunderland when he scored a third of his goals.
This user liked this post: Claret-On-A-T-Rex
-
- Posts: 821
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:34 pm
- Been Liked: 405 times
- Has Liked: 182 times
- Location: Rawtenstall
Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.
He is only a big loss if not replaced.Lets wait and see.claretspice wrote:Gray is a big loss. The very premise of the thread is nonsense.
These 2 users liked this post: Claret-On-A-T-Rex KateR
-
- Posts: 6382
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 3160 times
- Has Liked: 148 times
Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.
He's a big loss as it stands because he hasn't been replaced. He shouldn't have been allowed to leave until his replacement was in the building - or at least, until Dyche had strengthened the squad in other areas so that we were no weaker without Gray than we were at the beginning of the summer. That's not the case.Jimscho wrote:He is only a big loss if not replaced.Lets wait and see.
-
- Posts: 6382
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 3160 times
- Has Liked: 148 times
Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.
He's a big loss as it stands because he hasn't been replaced. He shouldn't have been allowed to leave until his replacement was in the building - or at least, until Dyche had strengthened the squad in other areas so that we were no weaker without Gray than we were at the beginning of the summer. That's not the case.Jimscho wrote:He is only a big loss if not replaced.Lets wait and see.
-
- Posts: 1577
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:40 am
- Been Liked: 428 times
- Has Liked: 1503 times
- Location: Leicestershire
- Contact:
Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.
Even if what you say is true, it is irrelevant as Andre didn't want to stay at Burnley . I am not interested in us signing Bony, we need someone that is quick hungry skilful and wants to play for us/make a name for himself.Top Claret wrote:Bony is not fit to lace Andras boots. He is overrated and over paid. One good season at Swansea and that his lot. All these Gray bashers would not recognise quality if it was swinging from their bell end
These 4 users liked this post: beeholeclaret Long Time Lurker JPS71 tim_noone
-
- Posts: 821
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:34 pm
- Been Liked: 405 times
- Has Liked: 182 times
- Location: Rawtenstall
Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.
How do you know the replacement isn't there.BFCcrazy seems to indicate something is happening and his track record is pretty good.claretspice wrote:He's a big loss as it stands because he hasn't been replaced. He shouldn't have been allowed to leave until his replacement was in the building - or at least, until Dyche had strengthened the squad in other areas so that we were no weaker without Gray than we were at the beginning of the summer. That's not the case.
-
- Posts: 6382
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 3160 times
- Has Liked: 148 times
Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.
Well he's not been announced, has he?Jimscho wrote:How do you know the replacement isn't there.BFCcrazy seems to indicate something is happening and his track record is pretty good.
Noone- no-one - has suggested a replacement is 100% done and complete. And until it is complete, we haven't replaced him. Deals can - and often do - fall over at the very last minute.
-
- Posts: 5639
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:15 am
- Been Liked: 1292 times
- Has Liked: 691 times
- Location: Tibet
Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.
He is as Walters is a winner .ablueclaret wrote:Gray is a big loss, Walters is going to have to be a revelation.
Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.
Agreed, depending on the replacement will determine how big a loss he is.Jimscho wrote:He is only a big loss if not replaced.Lets wait and see.
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.
I agree with KRBFC
Gosh!
Gosh!
Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.
Butterworth better be earning his corn
-
- Posts: 2742
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:04 am
- Been Liked: 655 times
- Has Liked: 337 times
Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.
I can't be bothered going through all the threads but the one and only thing that bothers me is that we've got a hundred million (?) in the bank and we've let Gray go BEFORE getting a replacement in. Why?
-
- Posts: 469
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:21 pm
- Been Liked: 180 times
- Has Liked: 129 times
- Location: Moorway
Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.
Danny on his way back home...
-
- Posts: 821
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:34 pm
- Been Liked: 405 times
- Has Liked: 182 times
- Location: Rawtenstall
Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.
As I said to you on the other thread.If we had played silly buggers with Watford, the Gray deal could have fallen over and then we would have had a disgruntled player.Some deals may just have to be done when the opportunity arises.I don't know what happens in these transfer dealings and neither does any one else on here.claretspice wrote:Well he's not been announced, has he?
Noone- no-one - has suggested a replacement is 100% done and complete. And until it is complete, we haven't replaced him. Deals can - and often do - fall over at the very last minute.
-
- Posts: 821
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:34 pm
- Been Liked: 405 times
- Has Liked: 182 times
- Location: Rawtenstall
Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.
Why have we got a hundred million in the bank.Have we not been paying players wages?Have we not been paying any bills?Have Sky decided to pay us this years money in advance?Grays fee and Keanes fee will probably be paid over the next 5 years(the length of their contracts),so not received that yet.Perhaps the Gray deal was to good to risk losing by messing Watford around.Winstonswhite wrote:I can't be bothered going through all the threads but the one and only thing that bothers me is that we've got a hundred million (?) in the bank and we've let Gray go BEFORE getting a replacement in. Why?
-
- Posts: 781
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:30 pm
- Been Liked: 82 times
- Has Liked: 99 times
-
- Posts: 12966
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
- Been Liked: 5499 times
- Has Liked: 961 times
Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.
Poor first touch, crap movement off the ball, no vision or awareness of players around him, lacking in composure and needs it laid on a plate as per our own fans admission through their defence of his lack of service.
That is why.
That is why.
This user liked this post: Jel
-
- Posts: 2742
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:04 am
- Been Liked: 655 times
- Has Liked: 337 times
Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.
I can't be arsed going into it and yes it's a slight exaggeration but please tell me the benefit of selling Gray before finding a replacement. I'm all ears.Jimscho wrote:Why have we got a hundred million in the bank.Have we not been paying players wages?Have we not been paying any bills?Have Sky decided to pay us this years money in advance?Grays fee and Keanes fee will probably be paid over the next 5 years(the length of their contracts),so not received that yet.Perhaps the Gray deal was to good to risk losing by messing Watford around.
Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.
What a load of rubbishDevils_Advocate wrote:Poor first touch, crap movement off the ball, no vision or awareness of players around him, lacking in composure and needs it laid on a plate as per our own fans admission through their defence of his lack of service.
That is why.

-
- Posts: 2483
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:37 am
- Been Liked: 1458 times
- Has Liked: 468 times
Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.
If you think Gray was found lacking last season, I'd love to hear your opinion of the rest of our players, because he was better than most of them.Dejavu wrote:Gray was awesome in the Championship but for me has been found lacking in the Prem.
-
- Posts: 8831
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:22 pm
- Been Liked: 3017 times
- Has Liked: 1860 times
Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.
they havent a clue, all these critics ! poor first touch clowns, once its been said, that becomes the mantra for the idiots on here, cue bin on't turf and his dull thick mates to say otherwise, blah blah etc.
These 2 users liked this post: 3putt tim_noone
Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.
Not according to fellow posters he wasn't. He came =10th in the Clarets Mad Player of the Season league.JohnMcGreal wrote:If you think Gray was found lacking last season, I'd love to hear your opinion of the rest of our players, because he was better than most of them.
Anyone who thinks he has a good first touch needs to have a word with themselves. I can't think of a Prem striker who has a worse one and it got worse last year not better.
He simply doesn't have the skill set to be a top class striker.