Why Gray isn't a big loss.

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Dejavu
Posts: 242
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 10:41 pm
Been Liked: 55 times
Has Liked: 36 times

Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by Dejavu » Wed Aug 09, 2017 8:30 pm

Gray was awesome in the Championship but for me has been found lacking in the Prem.
Here are some facts.
He only scored in 6 games.
Only "important" goal was the winner against Middlesborough. (Not counting Sunderland as we would have beat them anyway)
We can replace him with much better for less. E.g. Wilfred Bony is available @£13m and is still only 28.
Good luck to him but we have literally robbed Watford of £18.5m.
His first touch has got even worse than when we signed him!!
He doesn't score enough to build a team around. Vokes scored more and contributes far more to the team. Barnes also.

UTC.
This user liked this post: Claret-On-A-T-Rex

Sidney1st
Posts: 15478
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 3548 times
Has Liked: 5594 times
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by Sidney1st » Wed Aug 09, 2017 8:33 pm

Considering the promotion he helped fire us too, we got an excellent return for our initial investment.
These 5 users liked this post: ontario claret Leisure Claret-On-A-T-Rex Buxtonclaret FulledgeClaret

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 13046
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1920 times
Has Liked: 383 times

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Wed Aug 09, 2017 8:35 pm

A country mile our best striker.
His game was not all about goals. All season we looked a much better attacking threat when he played.
Plus the service he got was worse than laughable at times
These 2 users liked this post: Top Claret 3putt

kentonclaret
Posts: 7949
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 4:06 pm
Been Liked: 1196 times
Has Liked: 245 times

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by kentonclaret » Wed Aug 09, 2017 8:36 pm

Makes you wonder why BFC offered Gray a substantially improved new contract when he cannot control a ball and is such a poor finisher.
This user liked this post: JohnMac

CaptJohn
Posts: 1851
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 5:41 pm
Been Liked: 551 times
Has Liked: 407 times
Location: Malabo, EG/Chester
Contact:

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by CaptJohn » Wed Aug 09, 2017 8:41 pm

I'm sad to see him go. He was not the finished article for sure but I just hoped he would stay a bit longer and perhaps become the 20 goal Prem striker that he may become, with the Clarets.
Such is life.
These 3 users liked this post: Dodobdobodobo LoveCurryPies Woodleyclaret

bfccrazy
Posts: 5243
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 1:18 pm
Been Liked: 2124 times
Has Liked: 419 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by bfccrazy » Wed Aug 09, 2017 8:42 pm

Bony at 13 mil would be a brilliant bit of business - even at higher wages it would equate to a swap of Gray for Bony.
This user liked this post: tim_noone

Dejavu
Posts: 242
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 10:41 pm
Been Liked: 55 times
Has Liked: 36 times

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by Dejavu » Wed Aug 09, 2017 8:44 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:A country mile our best striker.
His game was not all about goals. All season we looked a much better attacking threat when he played.
Plus the service he got was worse than laughable at times
His game was all about goals.
If he could hold the ball up and create I would think differently.

Touchline
Posts: 125
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 1:15 pm
Been Liked: 26 times
Has Liked: 3 times

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by Touchline » Wed Aug 09, 2017 8:45 pm

He's a big loss and we would have much preferred to keep him. But he wanted to go for whatever reason. And there are probably a few good reasons for him. We're changing our style and we will adapt. Players will be coming in.

Touchline
Posts: 125
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 1:15 pm
Been Liked: 26 times
Has Liked: 3 times

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by Touchline » Wed Aug 09, 2017 8:45 pm

He's a big loss and we would have much preferred to keep him. But he wanted to go for whatever reason. And there are probably a few good reasons for him. We're changing our style and we will adapt. Players will be coming in.

Diesel
Posts: 3089
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2016 4:56 pm
Been Liked: 1228 times
Has Liked: 391 times

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by Diesel » Wed Aug 09, 2017 8:59 pm

Abcder

Saxoman
Posts: 5356
Joined: Sat May 28, 2016 7:26 pm
Been Liked: 577 times
Has Liked: 147 times

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by Saxoman » Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:02 pm

Bony is not available for 13m. Where do you get this garbage?

ablueclaret
Posts: 3148
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
Been Liked: 403 times
Has Liked: 50 times

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by ablueclaret » Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:03 pm

Gray is a big loss, Walters is going to have to be a revelation.

Dejavu
Posts: 242
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 10:41 pm
Been Liked: 55 times
Has Liked: 36 times

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by Dejavu » Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:05 pm

Saxoman wrote:Bony is not available for 13m. Where do you get this garbage?
All over the news. Swansea offered £10m and told to pay another £3m.

kentonclaret
Posts: 7949
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 4:06 pm
Been Liked: 1196 times
Has Liked: 245 times

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by kentonclaret » Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:05 pm

Bony is available for £17.5 million according to Pep on Talksport.

Saxoman
Posts: 5356
Joined: Sat May 28, 2016 7:26 pm
Been Liked: 577 times
Has Liked: 147 times

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by Saxoman » Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:06 pm

Dejavu wrote:All over the news. Swansea offered £10m and told to pay another £3m.
Twitter news? I look on BBC, I see nothing.

Walnutwillie
Posts: 95
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 11:22 am
Been Liked: 20 times
Has Liked: 14 times

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by Walnutwillie » Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:06 pm

Will be a huge loss to us next season
But Dyche will have known that a departure was inevitable. And surely has others in mind
Keep the faith

KRBFC
Posts: 19078
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3973 times
Has Liked: 1078 times

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by KRBFC » Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:06 pm

Barnes contributes more :lol: are you fkn stupid? He scored 9 goals in a hoofball defensive side, how many penalties? I know Vokes scored 1 at Soton. His Sunderland hattrick wasn't important because we "would've beat them anyway" Lmaoooooooo

Top Claret
Posts: 5125
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:50 am
Been Liked: 1127 times
Has Liked: 1238 times

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by Top Claret » Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:07 pm

Watford have got a bargain with Gray. 18 million is jack **** in this market. Has I have said before Gray is wip and he will play at the very highest level.

Funkydrummer
Posts: 8729
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:50 pm
Been Liked: 3114 times
Has Liked: 2155 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by Funkydrummer » Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:07 pm

He's that good, he's gone to Watford for crying out loud.

Not much of a step up, if any. More money probably and nearer the bright lights of London.

Will be interesting to see how he performs over the season, but I think we have robbed Watford
blind on this deal - well done the board. I don't think he really wanted to be here in the first
instance TBH.

Just my opinion mind.
This user liked this post: Woodleyclaret

taio
Posts: 12715
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3563 times
Has Liked: 399 times

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by taio » Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:07 pm

Widely reported that City want £13m for Bony. Not that we could meet his wage demands mind.

KRBFC
Posts: 19078
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3973 times
Has Liked: 1078 times

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by KRBFC » Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:08 pm

Bony is better? Based on what? Did he even score for Stoke last year?

Saxoman
Posts: 5356
Joined: Sat May 28, 2016 7:26 pm
Been Liked: 577 times
Has Liked: 147 times

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by Saxoman » Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:11 pm

Can't see you signing bony, as 1 his wages, 2 his age, no resale value and 3, he wouldn't sign for you IMO.

If he doesn't sign for swans, my feeling is he'll return to France.

Wile E Coyote
Posts: 8831
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:22 pm
Been Liked: 3017 times
Has Liked: 1860 times

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by Wile E Coyote » Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:13 pm

Dejavu wrote:Gray was awesome in the Championship but for me has been found lacking in the Prem.
Here are some facts.
He only scored in 6 games.
Only "important" goal was the winner against Middlesborough. (Not counting Sunderland as we would have beat them anyway)
We can replace him with much better for less. E.g. Wilfred Bony is available @£13m and is still only 28.
Good luck to him but we have literally robbed Watford of £18.5m.
His first touch has got even worse than when we signed him!!
He doesn't score enough to build a team around. Vokes scored more and contributes far more to the team. Barnes also.

UTC.
he is a big loss when the other available strikers are at best average, not exactly prolific to say the least.
Bit of a mystery why so many jump aboard this "first touch " nonsense , it just isnt the case.
With better support, who knows what he might have been capable of.
Burnley won once away, the meagre points tally was down to us being strugglers. Not much chance of matching Harry Kane if you play for a bottom end side.

Top Claret
Posts: 5125
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:50 am
Been Liked: 1127 times
Has Liked: 1238 times

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by Top Claret » Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:14 pm

Bony is not fit to lace Andras boots. He is overrated and over paid. One good season at Swansea and that his lot. All these Gray bashers would not recognise quality if it was swinging from their bell end
This user liked this post: joey13

taio
Posts: 12715
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3563 times
Has Liked: 399 times

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by taio » Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:15 pm

Gray will be missed but his first touch certainly has plenty of room for improvement. Anybody who watches regularly could surely see that.
Last edited by taio on Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.

joey13
Posts: 7507
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
Been Liked: 1772 times
Has Liked: 1231 times

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by joey13 » Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:18 pm

Bony who's on 100k a week , FFS

claretspice
Posts: 6382
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
Been Liked: 3160 times
Has Liked: 148 times

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by claretspice » Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:20 pm

Gray is a big loss. The very premise of the thread is nonsense.

Dejavu
Posts: 242
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 10:41 pm
Been Liked: 55 times
Has Liked: 36 times

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by Dejavu » Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:21 pm

joey13 wrote:Bony who's on 100k a week , FFS
If Swansea can afford him so can we. Anyway, I was only using him as an example of what is available.
This user liked this post: tim_noone

Jimscho
Posts: 821
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:34 pm
Been Liked: 405 times
Has Liked: 182 times
Location: Rawtenstall

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by Jimscho » Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:22 pm

Gray seems to be getting better and better as the night goes on and more and more of the moaners join the game.Dont remember him scoring many high scores on player ratings last year.Perhaps against Sunderland when he scored a third of his goals.
This user liked this post: Claret-On-A-T-Rex

Jimscho
Posts: 821
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:34 pm
Been Liked: 405 times
Has Liked: 182 times
Location: Rawtenstall

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by Jimscho » Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:24 pm

claretspice wrote:Gray is a big loss. The very premise of the thread is nonsense.
He is only a big loss if not replaced.Lets wait and see.
These 2 users liked this post: Claret-On-A-T-Rex KateR

claretspice
Posts: 6382
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
Been Liked: 3160 times
Has Liked: 148 times

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by claretspice » Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:29 pm

Jimscho wrote:He is only a big loss if not replaced.Lets wait and see.
He's a big loss as it stands because he hasn't been replaced. He shouldn't have been allowed to leave until his replacement was in the building - or at least, until Dyche had strengthened the squad in other areas so that we were no weaker without Gray than we were at the beginning of the summer. That's not the case.

claretspice
Posts: 6382
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
Been Liked: 3160 times
Has Liked: 148 times

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by claretspice » Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:29 pm

Jimscho wrote:He is only a big loss if not replaced.Lets wait and see.
He's a big loss as it stands because he hasn't been replaced. He shouldn't have been allowed to leave until his replacement was in the building - or at least, until Dyche had strengthened the squad in other areas so that we were no weaker without Gray than we were at the beginning of the summer. That's not the case.

levraiclaret
Posts: 1577
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:40 am
Been Liked: 428 times
Has Liked: 1503 times
Location: Leicestershire
Contact:

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by levraiclaret » Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:33 pm

Top Claret wrote:Bony is not fit to lace Andras boots. He is overrated and over paid. One good season at Swansea and that his lot. All these Gray bashers would not recognise quality if it was swinging from their bell end
Even if what you say is true, it is irrelevant as Andre didn't want to stay at Burnley . I am not interested in us signing Bony, we need someone that is quick hungry skilful and wants to play for us/make a name for himself.
These 4 users liked this post: beeholeclaret Long Time Lurker JPS71 tim_noone

Jimscho
Posts: 821
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:34 pm
Been Liked: 405 times
Has Liked: 182 times
Location: Rawtenstall

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by Jimscho » Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:34 pm

claretspice wrote:He's a big loss as it stands because he hasn't been replaced. He shouldn't have been allowed to leave until his replacement was in the building - or at least, until Dyche had strengthened the squad in other areas so that we were no weaker without Gray than we were at the beginning of the summer. That's not the case.
How do you know the replacement isn't there.BFCcrazy seems to indicate something is happening and his track record is pretty good.

claretspice
Posts: 6382
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
Been Liked: 3160 times
Has Liked: 148 times

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by claretspice » Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:35 pm

Jimscho wrote:How do you know the replacement isn't there.BFCcrazy seems to indicate something is happening and his track record is pretty good.
Well he's not been announced, has he?

Noone- no-one - has suggested a replacement is 100% done and complete. And until it is complete, we haven't replaced him. Deals can - and often do - fall over at the very last minute.

Tribesmen
Posts: 5639
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:15 am
Been Liked: 1292 times
Has Liked: 691 times
Location: Tibet

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by Tribesmen » Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:48 pm

ablueclaret wrote:Gray is a big loss, Walters is going to have to be a revelation.
He is as Walters is a winner .

KRBFC
Posts: 19078
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3973 times
Has Liked: 1078 times

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by KRBFC » Wed Aug 09, 2017 10:20 pm

Jimscho wrote:He is only a big loss if not replaced.Lets wait and see.
Agreed, depending on the replacement will determine how big a loss he is.

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by Lancasterclaret » Wed Aug 09, 2017 10:23 pm

I agree with KRBFC

Gosh!

DCWat
Posts: 9934
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:04 am
Been Liked: 4471 times
Has Liked: 3882 times

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by DCWat » Wed Aug 09, 2017 10:27 pm

Butterworth better be earning his corn

Winstonswhite
Posts: 2742
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:04 am
Been Liked: 655 times
Has Liked: 337 times

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by Winstonswhite » Wed Aug 09, 2017 10:28 pm

I can't be bothered going through all the threads but the one and only thing that bothers me is that we've got a hundred million (?) in the bank and we've let Gray go BEFORE getting a replacement in. Why?

Gnulty
Posts: 469
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:21 pm
Been Liked: 180 times
Has Liked: 129 times
Location: Moorway

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by Gnulty » Wed Aug 09, 2017 10:29 pm

Danny on his way back home...

Jimscho
Posts: 821
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:34 pm
Been Liked: 405 times
Has Liked: 182 times
Location: Rawtenstall

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by Jimscho » Wed Aug 09, 2017 10:30 pm

claretspice wrote:Well he's not been announced, has he?

Noone- no-one - has suggested a replacement is 100% done and complete. And until it is complete, we haven't replaced him. Deals can - and often do - fall over at the very last minute.
As I said to you on the other thread.If we had played silly buggers with Watford, the Gray deal could have fallen over and then we would have had a disgruntled player.Some deals may just have to be done when the opportunity arises.I don't know what happens in these transfer dealings and neither does any one else on here.

Jimscho
Posts: 821
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:34 pm
Been Liked: 405 times
Has Liked: 182 times
Location: Rawtenstall

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by Jimscho » Wed Aug 09, 2017 10:37 pm

Winstonswhite wrote:I can't be bothered going through all the threads but the one and only thing that bothers me is that we've got a hundred million (?) in the bank and we've let Gray go BEFORE getting a replacement in. Why?
Why have we got a hundred million in the bank.Have we not been paying players wages?Have we not been paying any bills?Have Sky decided to pay us this years money in advance?Grays fee and Keanes fee will probably be paid over the next 5 years(the length of their contracts),so not received that yet.Perhaps the Gray deal was to good to risk losing by messing Watford around.

strayclaret
Posts: 781
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:30 pm
Been Liked: 82 times
Has Liked: 99 times

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by strayclaret » Wed Aug 09, 2017 10:39 pm

Get Ade in :)
This user liked this post: tim_noone

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12966
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5499 times
Has Liked: 961 times

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by Devils_Advocate » Wed Aug 09, 2017 10:41 pm

Poor first touch, crap movement off the ball, no vision or awareness of players around him, lacking in composure and needs it laid on a plate as per our own fans admission through their defence of his lack of service.

That is why.
This user liked this post: Jel

Winstonswhite
Posts: 2742
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:04 am
Been Liked: 655 times
Has Liked: 337 times

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by Winstonswhite » Wed Aug 09, 2017 10:43 pm

Jimscho wrote:Why have we got a hundred million in the bank.Have we not been paying players wages?Have we not been paying any bills?Have Sky decided to pay us this years money in advance?Grays fee and Keanes fee will probably be paid over the next 5 years(the length of their contracts),so not received that yet.Perhaps the Gray deal was to good to risk losing by messing Watford around.
I can't be arsed going into it and yes it's a slight exaggeration but please tell me the benefit of selling Gray before finding a replacement. I'm all ears.

3putt
Posts: 713
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 6:23 pm
Been Liked: 180 times
Has Liked: 245 times

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by 3putt » Wed Aug 09, 2017 11:25 pm

Devils_Advocate wrote:Poor first touch, crap movement off the ball, no vision or awareness of players around him, lacking in composure and needs it laid on a plate as per our own fans admission through their defence of his lack of service.

That is why.
What a load of rubbish :roll:

JohnMcGreal
Posts: 2483
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:37 am
Been Liked: 1458 times
Has Liked: 468 times

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by JohnMcGreal » Wed Aug 09, 2017 11:49 pm

Dejavu wrote:Gray was awesome in the Championship but for me has been found lacking in the Prem.
If you think Gray was found lacking last season, I'd love to hear your opinion of the rest of our players, because he was better than most of them.

Wile E Coyote
Posts: 8831
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:22 pm
Been Liked: 3017 times
Has Liked: 1860 times

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by Wile E Coyote » Thu Aug 10, 2017 12:15 am

they havent a clue, all these critics ! poor first touch clowns, once its been said, that becomes the mantra for the idiots on here, cue bin on't turf and his dull thick mates to say otherwise, blah blah etc.
These 2 users liked this post: 3putt tim_noone

Dejavu
Posts: 242
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 10:41 pm
Been Liked: 55 times
Has Liked: 36 times

Re: Why Gray isn't a big loss.

Post by Dejavu » Thu Aug 10, 2017 12:28 am

JohnMcGreal wrote:If you think Gray was found lacking last season, I'd love to hear your opinion of the rest of our players, because he was better than most of them.
Not according to fellow posters he wasn't. He came =10th in the Clarets Mad Player of the Season league.
Anyone who thinks he has a good first touch needs to have a word with themselves. I can't think of a Prem striker who has a worse one and it got worse last year not better.
He simply doesn't have the skill set to be a top class striker.

Post Reply