When you put it like that, it's not so bad.jlup1980 wrote:Suggesting it's around £5m, which given the current market, his age and his record isn't bad. £5m is £1m in old money. Overall we'll have paid out £1.5 to replace Gray with Wood and Wells. That's clever business.
Nahki Wells
-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 937 times
Re: Nahki Wells
Re: Nahki Wells
Apparently we are only signing him to **** off the Leeds fans because they want Wells to replace Wood. Seems that every cloud has a silver lining.
Re: Nahki Wells
Sadly as you jumped into someone else's discussion, and you didn't read the initial post.Rileybobs wrote:That's just a collection of words which form a nonsensical sentence.
You said Taylor wouldn't play this season. I pointed out that he already had played this season.
If you had, you would of* been aware of what was meant by a season ( not a game )
-
- Posts: 5069
- Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 3:14 pm
- Been Liked: 1157 times
- Has Liked: 496 times
Re: Nahki Wells
By that logic we only got £5m for England defender Michael Keane. Astonishingly bad business.IndigoLake wrote:When you put it like that, it's not so bad.
-
- Posts: 18550
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 7611 times
- Has Liked: 1582 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Nahki Wells
It's a public messageboard, I pointed out that you were wrong in thinking that Taylor would not play all season, because he already has. Best to just admit you're wrong.MACCA wrote:Sadly as you jumped into someone else's discussion, and you didn't read the initial post.
If you had, you would of* been aware of what was meant by a season ( not a game )
Re: Nahki Wells
Nobody has anything against Wells, and we all hope he does well, but he quite clearly has never been our first choice, and when we have spent weeks chasing other targets, this signing smacks of a return to 2014/15, and desperation.
There are questions that need to be asked, when we should have ample money to spend, why we have resorted to signing an injured Championship striker, who will have no sell on fee at the end of his contract with us, and has done absolutely nothing in his career to suggest he will even make it as a top Championship striker.
There are legitimate concerns about this signing. Course we bloody have faith in Dyche, but the club and manager should never be exonerated from blame, or criticism, where it's warranted. This isn't a dictatorship.
Again, if we are holding back funds for a CB and/or winger then fine, but it's less that 48 hours before the window shuts and we still need blindingly obvious reinforcements at the back and out wide. If we fail to sign a CB or winger in time, then the signing of Wells is nothing more than a pitiful end to another transfer window failure.
There are questions that need to be asked, when we should have ample money to spend, why we have resorted to signing an injured Championship striker, who will have no sell on fee at the end of his contract with us, and has done absolutely nothing in his career to suggest he will even make it as a top Championship striker.
There are legitimate concerns about this signing. Course we bloody have faith in Dyche, but the club and manager should never be exonerated from blame, or criticism, where it's warranted. This isn't a dictatorship.
Again, if we are holding back funds for a CB and/or winger then fine, but it's less that 48 hours before the window shuts and we still need blindingly obvious reinforcements at the back and out wide. If we fail to sign a CB or winger in time, then the signing of Wells is nothing more than a pitiful end to another transfer window failure.
This user liked this post: summitclaret
Re: Nahki Wells
Edited- duplicated. See above.
Last edited by TsarBomba on Wed Aug 30, 2017 4:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Nahki Wells
If they're not a guaranteed starter, Taylor is exactly the profile of player we should be signing. Ones that will push the current incumbent and eventually, take their place in the team.MACCA wrote:Cover and competition for places.
Don't think he will take Wards place for a year or 2 though IMO
Re: Nahki Wells
Agree but Walters, Bardsley and Wells just don't do that. Taylor, Cork and Wood are great signings.DCWat wrote:If they're not a guaranteed starter, Taylor is exactly the profile of player we should be signing. Ones that will push the current incumbent and eventually, take their place in the team.
Re: Nahki Wells
Rileybobs wrote:It's a public messageboard, I pointed out that you were wrong in thinking that Taylor would not play all season, because he already has. Best to just admit you're wrong.
I'm wrong.
And I definitely did not know Taylor had played already this season.
Thank you for pointing out my opinion was wrong

Re: Nahki Wells
Walters and Bardsley provide competition and experience. Not sure how Wells fits into either category.
Re: Nahki Wells
Pecking order?
1. Vokes
2. Wood
3: Barnes, Walters, Wells
1. Vokes
2. Wood
3: Barnes, Walters, Wells
-
- Posts: 6713
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1434 times
- Has Liked: 9462 times
- Location: Chiang Rai, Thailand.
Re: Nahki Wells
I'm tired out after reading all this thread.
These 2 users liked this post: BertiesBeehole IndigoLake
Re: Nahki Wells
DCWat wrote:If they're not a guaranteed starter, Taylor is exactly the profile of player we should be signing. Ones that will push the current incumbent and eventually, take their place in the team.
Absolutely, but Taylor has already played this season!
Last edited by MACCA on Wed Aug 30, 2017 4:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 18550
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 7611 times
- Has Liked: 1582 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Nahki Wells
No probs, here to help!!MACCA wrote:I'm wrong.
And I definitely did not know Taylor had played already this season.
Thank you for pointing out my opinion was wrong
-
- Posts: 291
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:00 pm
- Been Liked: 125 times
- Has Liked: 53 times
Re: Nahki Wells
I for one am glad we are signing him.
It's going to take some people on here a bloody eternity to pick all the toys up they have thrown out of their peaks.
Welcome to Turf Moor Nakhi. You'll get my support.
It's going to take some people on here a bloody eternity to pick all the toys up they have thrown out of their peaks.
Welcome to Turf Moor Nakhi. You'll get my support.
These 2 users liked this post: BertiesBeehole Godalmingclaret
-
- Posts: 18550
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 7611 times
- Has Liked: 1582 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Nahki Wells
Macca is right, Taylor has already played this season.
-
- Posts: 5069
- Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 3:14 pm
- Been Liked: 1157 times
- Has Liked: 496 times
Re: Nahki Wells
Taylor hasn't played in the league this season. That's the bread and butter.
Re: Nahki Wells
15k to 20k a week to get splinters in his arse. Nice work if you can get it.mikeS wrote:Pecking order?
1. Vokes
2. Wood
3: Barnes, Walters, Wells
Re: Nahki Wells
He hasn't played yet this season.Marlonspants wrote:I for one am glad we are signing him.
It's going to take some people on here a bloody eternity to pick all the toys up they have thrown out of their peaks.
Welcome to Turf Moor Nakhi. You'll get my support.
Re: Nahki Wells
No, a couple of cup games equals a good season.UpTheBeehole wrote:Taylor hasn't played in the league this season. That's the bread and butter.
Pope last year was mesmeric, can't believe he got over looked for England.
-
- Posts: 5548
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1448 times
- Has Liked: 1229 times
- Location: Ferkham Hall
Re: Nahki Wells
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nahki_Wells#Club_career" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
pop down to his career statistics. 42goals in 91 apps for Bradford followed by 44goals in 143 for Huddersfield. Can't be written off.
pop down to his career statistics. 42goals in 91 apps for Bradford followed by 44goals in 143 for Huddersfield. Can't be written off.
-
- Posts: 18550
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 7611 times
- Has Liked: 1582 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Nahki Wells
The Pope is Argentinian, you wally.MACCA wrote:No, a couple of cup games equals a good season.
Pope last year was mesmeric, can't believe he got over looked for England.
Re: Nahki Wells
He'll get all our support.Marlonspants wrote:I for one am glad we are signing him.
It's going to take some people on here a bloody eternity to pick all the toys up they have thrown out of their peaks.
Welcome to Turf Moor Nakhi. You'll get my support.
But there are legitimate concerns why we have ended up signing an average, injured, Championship striker with less than 48 hours of the window remaining.
It smacks of failure, desperation. An almost 'he'll do' signing, to cover the cracks, bolster the squad, instead of it being a signing to seriously strengthen the first 11, which is what we STILL need to do.
-
- Posts: 5069
- Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 3:14 pm
- Been Liked: 1157 times
- Has Liked: 496 times
Re: Nahki Wells
Lower league footballerpiston broke wrote:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nahki_Wells#Club_career
pop down to his career statistics. 42goals in 91 apps for Bradford followed by 44goals in 143 for Huddersfield. Can't be written off.
-
- Posts: 821
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:34 pm
- Been Liked: 405 times
- Has Liked: 182 times
- Location: Rawtenstall
Re: Nahki Wells
I am sure the Board and Dyche will agree a price that they will spend on a player.I don't know how badly Dyche wanted Waris or Andone or anybody else but I am sure that the Board and Dyche discuss our targets and have a price limit.They do talk to each other not just bandy figures around on a message board.As for net spend I don't know the figures and if I start saying we only got around £31m for Keane and Gray not £50m I will have Cricketfieldclaret after meKRBFC wrote:So did Dyche not really want Waris?
What's our net spend this summer?
At a guess, we are set to record a profit on outgoings/incomings.

Re: Nahki Wells
Firstly, this is nothing like 14/15. Ironically, had we signed Wells then we arguably would have had a much better season.TsarBomba wrote:Nobody has anything against Wells, and we all hope he does well, but he quite clearly has never been our first choice, and when we have spent weeks chasing other targets, this signing smacks of a return to 2014/15, and desperation.
There are questions that need to be asked, when we should have ample money to spend, why we have resorted to signing an injured Championship striker, who will have no sell on fee at the end of his contract with us, and has done absolutely nothing in his career to suggest he will even make it as a top Championship striker.
There are legitimate concerns about this signing. Course we bloody have faith in Dyche, but the club and manager should never be exonerated from blame, or criticism, where it's warranted. This isn't a dictatorship.
Again, if we are holding back funds for a CB and/or winger then fine, but it's less that 48 hours before the window shuts and we still need blindingly obvious reinforcements at the back and out wide. If we fail to sign a CB or winger in time, then the signing of Wells is nothing more than a pitiful end to another transfer window failure.
Secondly, his scoring record at Championship level is better than Vokes and vastly better than Barnes. I haven't compared to Wood but I suspect it's similar.
Thirdly, we've just signed Chris Wood for £15m and we're playing 451. Vokes and Wood are our main strikers. We needed a different option from the bench and Wells gives us that. He certainly has more goal threat than Barnes or Walters. How much do you think we should be signing a 3rd / 4th choice striker for?
Fourthly, have faith.
UTC
These 8 users liked this post: dsr whentheballmoves BertiesBeehole Greenmile IndigoLake Quicknick piston broke 3putt
Re: Nahki Wells
More like:mikeS wrote:Pecking order?
1. Vokes
2. Wood
3: Barnes, Walters, Wells
Vokes + Barnes OR Wells
OR
Wood + Barnes OR Wells
Having said that, if we do sign Wells today I think Barnes will be off tomorrow.
Re: Nahki Wells
There may be concerns over injuries to players and strength in depth but the team that played Spurs is a good one. If our players remained injury free for the season (unlikely I know) are you saying our first eleven still isn't good enough for the PL?TsarBomba wrote:It smacks of failure, desperation. An almost 'he'll do' signing, to cover the cracks, bolster the squad, instead of it being a signing to seriously strengthen the first 11, which is what we STILL need to do.
Re: Nahki Wells
Yeah but 'Premier League players' cost a lot of money in fees and wages. We don't have the budget for a squad full of 'Premier League players'.UpTheBeehole wrote:If all we want is another body and it doesn't matter about the quality, then sign Doris the cleaner.
We're in the Premier League. Let's sign some Premier League players to play in our Premier League team.
Walters, Bardsley, Taylor, Wells - these are Moneyball signings, the sorts of signings we need for our squad, nothing to get down about.
Wells is well-known to Dyche and staff so should be able to integrate. His goal record in the Championship stands up to comparison with Vokes, Wood, Barnes, Gray. He fits the position vacated by Gray, and he'll give us the option of changing things from the bench. When fit I can see him making a similar contribution to Gray.
Re: Nahki Wells
Used in the right way, with support from another striker and a midfield that has arguably the best eye for goal in a generation, I think he could be an astute signing.
Re: Nahki Wells
It's not about whether he will get our support or not, that's a given. I'll give him my full support. What most people are miffed about is that:
a. this seems like a cheap option
b. this isn't a signing that will drastically improve our team (squad options maybe)
c. This could signal the end in any pursuits for a much needed quality wide/link man
d. As we have been linked with him in the past, it smacks of a name at the end of the list who can "do a job"
a. this seems like a cheap option
b. this isn't a signing that will drastically improve our team (squad options maybe)
c. This could signal the end in any pursuits for a much needed quality wide/link man
d. As we have been linked with him in the past, it smacks of a name at the end of the list who can "do a job"
-
- Posts: 311
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:49 pm
- Been Liked: 300 times
- Has Liked: 96 times
Re: Nahki Wells
Has he even signed ?
-
- Posts: 5069
- Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 3:14 pm
- Been Liked: 1157 times
- Has Liked: 496 times
Re: Nahki Wells
We do. We receive £100m in TV money each season. We've just made £50m from selling players.lucs86 wrote:Yeah but 'Premier League players' cost a lot of money in fees and wages. We don't have the budget for a squad full of 'Premier League players'.
We've got stacks and stacks of cash.
-
- Posts: 18550
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 7611 times
- Has Liked: 1582 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Nahki Wells
The more I think about it the more I think this signing is a marketing ploy to increase our exposure in Bermuda.
These 3 users liked this post: BertiesBeehole IndigoLake Juan Tanamera
Re: Nahki Wells
Swansea gets Renato Sanches, West Brom gets Krychowiak. We get Wells!
-
- Posts: 6382
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 3160 times
- Has Liked: 148 times
Re: Nahki Wells
The touchstone for a decent summer is to end it with a stronger first eleven AND a stronger squad than we started with.Jimscho wrote:I am sure the Board and Dyche will agree a price that they will spend on a player.I don't know how badly Dyche wanted Waris or Andone or anybody else but I am sure that the Board and Dyche discuss our targets and have a price limit.They do talk to each other not just bandy figures around on a message board.As for net spend I don't know the figures and if I start saying we only got around £31m for Keane and Gray not £50m I will have Cricketfieldclaret after me
At present, thats not the case - Cork improves the first eleven, Wood may or may not do so but is in a battle for his place with Vokes, and everyone else signed is currently padding out the squad - and so far as anyone can tell based on his record, Wells doesn't change that. The fact that Arfield, Heaton and others vastly exceeded expectations is no guarantee that we'll do so every time and besides, with our financial position we ought to be well beyond the point where we need to pull rabbits out of the hat in the transfer market. Wells isnt young enough to be an investment and both the fact he's missed a big chunk of pre season and has a variable record in the lower divisions suggests he's not going to have an immediate starting impact. The fact the fee might not be 10 million is a pyhric victory when he's unlikely to be a player who immediately improves the first eleven.
There's still 30 hours left in the window, so still time to bring in a couple of players who do improve the first team. But we're moving closer to the point of reckoning and it's hard to be confident that we're going to be able to view the window as a net success.
These 3 users liked this post: IndigoLake Quicknick tiger76
-
- Posts: 18550
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 7611 times
- Has Liked: 1582 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Nahki Wells
And don't forget Manchester United got Lukaku.Slurpy wrote:Swansea gets Renato Sanches, West Brom gets Krychowiak. We get Wells!
-
- Posts: 7536
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
- Been Liked: 2281 times
- Has Liked: 4044 times
Re: Nahki Wells
File under Juke/Sordell. #last minute/sixth choice before the window shuts.
Re: Nahki Wells
Renato Sanches won't cut it in this league not a player who likes any sort of contact goes missing alot.Slurpy wrote:Swansea gets Renato Sanches, West Brom gets Krychowiak. We get Wells!
-
- Posts: 821
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:34 pm
- Been Liked: 405 times
- Has Liked: 182 times
- Location: Rawtenstall
Re: Nahki Wells
We have wages and bills to pay and we got £31/32m not £50m.UpTheBeehole wrote:We do. We receive £100m in TV money each season. We've just made £50m from selling players.
We've got stacks and stacks of cash.
Re: Nahki Wells
At least I've heard of Wells!Slurpy wrote:Swansea gets Renato Sanches, West Brom gets Krychowiak. We get Wells!
Re: Nahki Wells
Surely the only reliable measure of whether the first eleven is better or not is results. on that basis it's better than it was last season.claretspice wrote:The touchstone for a decent summer is to end it with a stronger first eleven AND a stronger squad than we started with.
At present, thats not the case - Cork improves the first eleven, Wood may or may not do so but is in a battle for his place with Vokes, and everyone else signed is currently padding out the squad - and so far as anyone can tell based on his record, Wells doesn't change that. The fact that Arfield, Heaton and others vastly exceeded expectations is no guarantee that we'll do so every time and besides, with our financial position we ought to be well beyond the point where we need to pull rabbits out of the hat in the transfer market. The fact the fee might not be 10 million is a pyhric victory when he's unlikely to be a player who immediately improves the first eleven.
There's still 30 hours left in the window, so still time to bring in a couple of players who do improve the first team. But we're moving closer to the point of reckoning and it's hard to be confident that we're going to be able to view the window as a net success.
Re: Nahki Wells
We've also not paid out the headline figures - works both ways so it's still a valid point.Jimscho wrote:We have wages and bills to pay and we got £31/32m not £50m.
-
- Posts: 7949
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 4:06 pm
- Been Liked: 1196 times
- Has Liked: 245 times
Re: Nahki Wells
"At least I've heard of Wells"!
In North Somerset isn't it?
In North Somerset isn't it?

Last edited by kentonclaret on Wed Aug 30, 2017 5:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 4461
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
- Been Liked: 2462 times
- Has Liked: 352 times
Re: Nahki Wells
For all our recent successes, the one niggle remains the fairly limited pool from which we shop. Previously it was mainly due to resources, but this summer I think there's an element that Dyche simply doesn't trust what his recruitment team are bringing to him. We continue to essentially buy almost exclusively from a relatively small pool of players that Dyche and his coaching team know well through their own history or because we've encountered the players regularly in opposition.claretspice wrote:The touchstone for a decent summer is to end it with a stronger first eleven AND a stronger squad than we started with.
At present, thats not the case - Cork improves the first eleven, Wood may or may not do so but is in a battle for his place with Vokes, and everyone else signed is currently padding out the squad - and so far as anyone can tell based on his record, Wells doesn't change that. The fact that Arfield, Heaton and others vastly exceeded expectations is no guarantee that we'll do so every time and besides, with our financial position we ought to be well beyond the point where we need to pull rabbits out of the hat in the transfer market. The fact the fee might not be 10 million is a pyhric victory when he's unlikely to be a player who immediately improves the first eleven.
There's still 30 hours left in the window, so still time to bring in a couple of players who do improve the first team. But we're moving closer to the point of reckoning and it's hard to be confident that we're going to be able to view the window as a net success.
There's even a suggestion with this deal that the Chief Executive has been particularly influential.
-
- Posts: 76640
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37346 times
- Has Liked: 5703 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Nahki Wells
Not so - Taylor was always our number one target for left back. We tried very hard to sign him a year ago.KRBFC wrote:I like Taylor, a good signing. The point is, Robertson appeared to be Dyche's main LB target, we wouldn't pay the fee for him.
Re: Nahki Wells
When I saw him play in the playoffs I thought he looked a really good player and someone we should go for if they didn't get promoted. Stood out as a quality footballer and he's a player who can easily increase in value.
The comments on this site make me cringe. Do people expect us to go spend £30million on someone who might get fail and be worth £10 next summer after spending £5 on wages?
The comments on this site make me cringe. Do people expect us to go spend £30million on someone who might get fail and be worth £10 next summer after spending £5 on wages?
These 2 users liked this post: BertiesBeehole snapcrackleandpop
-
- Posts: 4396
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:00 am
- Been Liked: 1619 times
- Has Liked: 694 times
Re: Nahki Wells
Welcome to Burnley! I hope the lad makes a few people eat their words.
-
- Posts: 821
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:34 pm
- Been Liked: 405 times
- Has Liked: 182 times
- Location: Rawtenstall
Re: Nahki Wells
I have to disagree with you on the strength of the squad.I think the players brought in are better than those that have left,apart from Keane.Not to sorry to lose Gray,don't think he wanted to be here.Boyd I liked but he was better protecting the defence than attacking.Thought Darikwa was out of his depth in Prem.Think Taylor,Bardsley,Walters are better back up squad players and Cork and Wood willl be good signings.I do think we need another CB as it could be a problem with an injury.claretspice wrote:The touchstone for a decent summer is to end it with a stronger first eleven AND a stronger squad than we started with.
At present, thats not the case - Cork improves the first eleven, Wood may or may not do so but is in a battle for his place with Vokes, and everyone else signed is currently padding out the squad - and so far as anyone can tell based on his record, Wells doesn't change that. The fact that Arfield, Heaton and others vastly exceeded expectations is no guarantee that we'll do so every time and besides, with our financial position we ought to be well beyond the point where we need to pull rabbits out of the hat in the transfer market. Wells isnt young enough to be an investment and both the fact he's missed a big chunk of pre season and has a variable record in the lower divisions suggests he's not going to have an immediate starting impact. The fact the fee might not be 10 million is a pyhric victory when he's unlikely to be a player who immediately improves the first eleven.
There's still 30 hours left in the window, so still time to bring in a couple of players who do improve the first team. But we're moving closer to the point of reckoning and it's hard to be confident that we're going to be able to view the window as a net success.