- Screenshot_20180609-201338.jpg (87.83 KiB) Viewed 2371 times
Come on England!
Or Spain are in poor form?barba wrote:Half time and Tunisia are drawing 0-0 with Spain.
Spain majority of possession but three good chances for Tunisia.
Despite their precious abject WC performances they have dramatically improved over 12 months.
No way a guaranteed 3 points.
I agree an on form Spain would blow them away.Japebe43 wrote:Or Spain are in poor form?
You have clearly been on the Ribina tonight UTC, hope you arrive home safeUpTheClaretsFCBK wrote:I’m watching France vs USA.
1-0 to the States at the minute and France were very much in form coming into this game.
Anything can happen in football, we’ve seen stranger things happen than this England squad winning the tournament.
Slim chance, but you can only back the lads and hope for some luck.
Just don’t see the point in being morbid about our chances.South West Claret. wrote:You have clearly been on the Ribina tonight UTC, hope you arrive home safe
Don't take any notice of South West Claret, he's a Virgin with an arsehole the shape of an old wooden ruler.UpTheClaretsFCBK wrote:Just don’t see the point in being morbid about our chances.
Approach it like supporting the Clarets. Get behind them and hope for miracles.
Why do you think that, when the history of England at the World Cup suggests we will get knocked out by the first decent team we come up against?dushanbe wrote:I don’t understand the negativity about England. I fancy us to get it the quarters and then it’s a lottery.
FactualFrank wrote:I looked at the possible route a while back and I still can't see us making it past the Quarter Finals.
scouseclaret wrote:Why do you think that, when the history of England at the World Cup suggests we will get knocked out by the first decent team we come up against?
Easily achievable and our current odds of 16/1 are a licence to print money by laying them as soon as they are out the (easy) group they/we are in.Bin Ont Turf wrote:Reaching the Quarter Finals would be a good World Cup for us though.
I'm not looking at it from an angle, I just think getting to the quarters would be a good tournament for us.Diesel wrote:Easily achievable and our current odds of 16/1 are a licence to print money by laying them as soon as they are out the (easy) group they/we are in.
Same Stan, ultimately we will be found wanting but I think these young lads will give it a go, that's all we can expect.Bin Ont Turf wrote:I'm not looking at it from an angle, I just think getting to the quarters would be a good tournament for us.
I'll be enjoying it anyway, even if this boards....... 'look at me and how much I don't care for England' lot won't be.
pushpinpussy wrote:The England team visited an orphanage in Russia yesterday.
"It's heartbreaking to see their little faces with no hope" said Vladimir age 5
sorry boatshed, but that doesn't mean anything, by virtue of playing on a world stage one could argue the players of at that stage, I know what you mean generally, but it is a loose term that is hard to define. Would Maradona's team mates count, they were ultimately world champions, but only he had the status as a world class player.boatshed bill wrote:To win the world cup you need at least some world-class players
And that could be the case of our 'class of 2018'. They have an opportunity to make themselves legends like Hurst. IMO we've as good a chance as at any time since 66. I never went in for all that golden generation ********.Wile E Coyote wrote:no he wasnt in anyones terms world class, but as a hat trick hero and world cup winner, what does that make him?
Prior to 66?Vino blanco wrote:Geoff Hurst never was world class but Bobby Charlton, Bobby Moore and Gordan Banks were.
I think you say that with hindsight. Doubt anyone felt they were world class before winning the world cup.Vino blanco wrote:Yes of course, they didn't just become great players in the World Cup finals. Compare them to Butland, Jones, Henderson etc, in their positions, there is no comparison whatsoever.
I know what you're saying. I guess it is a fairly loose term , regarding world class players I think we know one when we see one.Wile E Coyote wrote:sorry boatshed, but that doesn't mean anything, by virtue of playing on a world stage one could argue the players of at that stage, I know what you mean generally, but it is a loose term that is hard to define. Would Maradona's team mates count, they were ultimately world champions, but only he had the status as a world class player.
I know ronaldo, bale, messi and neymar and a host of others are regarded as "world class" but it is a team game, and as Burnley proved, it doesnt necessarily require great individual performances, just a genuine TEAM ethic to succeed.
England had one player prior to 66 everyone felt would be world class.. Duncan Edwards.. At the time of his death, nobody felt bobby Charlton was a world beater too..Vino blanco wrote:Were you watching England and International football before the 1966 World Cup? I was and I think I know what I am talking about.
True, but I still don’t think that makes the knock-out stages a lottery.Japebe43 wrote:To be fair, Spain had that history for a long time, as did Portugal..
Ordinary players can win the World Cup if they are fortunate enough to play in a team with someone as exceptional as Maradona. Sadly, England have never had such a player, and certainly don’t this time around.Wile E Coyote wrote:sorry boatshed, but that doesn't mean anything, by virtue of playing on a world stage one could argue the players of at that stage, I know what you mean generally, but it is a loose term that is hard to define. Would Maradona's team mates count, they were ultimately world champions, but only he had the status as a world class player.
I know ronaldo, bale, messi and neymar and a host of others are regarded as "world class" but it is a team game, and as Burnley proved, it doesnt necessarily require great individual performances, just a genuine TEAM ethic to succeed.
The point I'm making is the world cup established these players reputations on the world stage, and our lads of 2018 have that same opportunity.Vino blanco wrote:Duncan Edwards died in 1958 as a very young man, that's 8 years before the World Cup and has no bearing on my earlier posts.
That is certainly true. Whether they can grasp that opportunity, well...who knows?Japebe43 wrote:The point I'm making is the world cup established these players reputations on the world stage, and our lads of 2018 have that same opportunity.
Not saying they will.. Not at all.. But the opportunity is there for them.Vino blanco wrote:Fair enough jape, you have your opinion I have mine (based on being there at the time). I hope you are right about this current set of players proving themselves, I don't hold out much hope for them or you.
Unless you are blanking the tournament, why would you need me to?Vino blanco wrote:The opportunity is there for every player in every squad from every country to do so. Let me know after the World Cup who you think has succeeded.
true, because they're english.KRBFC wrote:France are a spent force? they have a scary young side, quality allover the place they even left Lacazette and Martial at home. The current England side is the worst group of players I've ever seen play for England.
Apart from Kyle Walker and Kane I don't think there's a single English player who would start for France.
Interesting that you bring up Sterling.Japebe43 wrote:Think some of our players get underated unbelievably.. Sterling for example is played, successfully, for his club by the manager acknowledged as the best in world football.. But he's not good enough for england.. Apparently..
Who scored most goals for city this season? Sane.. Or sterling?boatshed bill wrote:Interesting that you bring up Sterling.
Good enough for England, but in my opinion not as good as Sane who isn't good enough for Germany.
Not really the point though, is it?Japebe43 wrote:Who scored most goals for city this season? Sane.. Or sterling?
OK, who does guardiola favour more? Sterling starts more regularly..boatshed bill wrote:Not really the point though, is it?
If scoring goals was the criteria by which "world-class" was judged there would be no world-class defenders!