Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
scouseclaret
Posts: 2699
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 7:29 pm
Been Liked: 901 times
Has Liked: 273 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by scouseclaret » Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:28 pm

Elizabeth wrote:
Wed Jul 27, 2022 7:34 pm
The Championship is full of hardened professionals and I doubt the loss of McNeil and Cornet , if it happens , will affect our ability to compete. In fact I expect us to be more competitive without them.
That’s a bizarre thing to say. How can the loss of two of our best players not affect our ability to compete?

I’m absolutely terrified by what’s going on at our club at the moment. We were always going to lose some our prized assets after relegation, but this is a complete fire-sale. If you add-in the parachute payments it goes well beyond what’s needed to cover the debt. This bears all the hallmarks of the asset strip I feared it might be when Pace took over.

RVclaret
Posts: 16501
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4552 times
Has Liked: 3055 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:28 pm

scouseclaret wrote:
Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:28 pm
That’s a bizarre thing to say. How can the loss of two of our best players not affect our ability to compete?

I’m absolutely terrified by what’s going on at our club at the moment. We were always going to lose some our prized assets after relegation, but this is a complete fire-sale. If you add-in the parachute payments it goes well beyond what’s needed to cover the debt. This bears all the hallmarks of the asset strip I feared it might be when Pace took over.
Firesale and asset stripping in one go - bravo sir!
This user liked this post: GodIsADeeJay81

FCBurnley
Posts: 11616
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
Been Liked: 2291 times
Has Liked: 1379 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by FCBurnley » Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:35 pm

Not the most inspiring presser I have ever heard by VK today
Not his fault. He was just reporting the facts as they are. Sounded like Max and Dwight will be gone to pay off the debt then bring in some more players on the cheap.

Granny WeatherWax
Posts: 2915
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 3:20 pm
Been Liked: 728 times
Has Liked: 93 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Granny WeatherWax » Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:35 pm

scouseclaret wrote:
Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:28 pm
That’s a bizarre thing to say. How can the loss of two of our best players not affect our ability to compete?

I’m absolutely terrified by what’s going on at our club at the moment. We were always going to lose some our prized assets after relegation, but this is a complete fire-sale. If you add-in the parachute payments it goes well beyond what’s needed to cover the debt. This bears all the hallmarks of the asset strip I feared it might be when Pace took over.
Who have we lost that you wouldn’t have expected too?

Rileybobs
Posts: 18751
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 7700 times
Has Liked: 1593 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Rileybobs » Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:38 pm

Granny WeatherWax wrote:
Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:35 pm
Who have we lost that you wouldn’t have expected too?
I know that wasn’t aimed at me, but Mee, Collins, Hennessey and McNeil (should he go) for me. Put it this way, if McNeil and Cornet leave there isn’t a single player left who I thought may leave.

PaintYorkClaretnBlue
Posts: 1848
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:42 pm
Been Liked: 673 times
Has Liked: 1257 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by PaintYorkClaretnBlue » Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:38 pm

forzagranata wrote:
Wed Jul 27, 2022 6:59 pm
"We have lost a huge core of the team without really making money…we are going to be making money on two or three players but out of 12 core players you make money on maybe three or four, that is not enough to replace all these bodies with quality."
Basically he is saying that the core of our team was so old/out of contract we haven’t got anything for most of them!

Taffy on the wing
Posts: 5633
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2016 3:41 am
Been Liked: 1210 times
Has Liked: 3774 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Taffy on the wing » Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:39 pm

How to say the same thing, dozens of different ways......over & over again.

Robbo1882
Posts: 114
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 3:41 pm
Been Liked: 26 times
Has Liked: 9 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Robbo1882 » Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:39 pm

As said many times here we were always going to lose our better players because they want to carry on playing in the Prem and more importantly still get a nice shiny new Prem contract, and good luck to them, to think that they would stay and turn down an offer of more money and Permier League football then some people need to wake up. Fire sale and Asset stripping……oh dear
This user liked this post: Enola Gay

ClaretPete001
Posts: 3271
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2022 11:39 am
Been Liked: 550 times
Has Liked: 189 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by ClaretPete001 » Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:39 pm

Granny WeatherWax wrote:
Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:35 pm
Who have we lost that you wouldn’t have expected too?
That's a bit like a thug punching you in the face and saying "I'm a thug what did you expect".

True, but not really the point.

Granny WeatherWax
Posts: 2915
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 3:20 pm
Been Liked: 728 times
Has Liked: 93 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Granny WeatherWax » Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:41 pm

Rileybobs wrote:
Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:38 pm
I know that wasn’t aimed at me, but Mee, Collins, Hennessey and McNeil (should he go) for me. Put it this way, if McNeil and Cornet leave there isn’t a single player left who I thought may leave.
Was always likely clubs would come in for Collins and McNeil, they are good players. Mee was a free, so very very likely a premier club would want him, can’t blame him, and we can’t compete with the premier league lure. Hennessy has a 2 year deal at forest and I suspect VK was more than happy for him to leave as it doesn’t fit the way he wants to play, and would be on a decent wedge.

TsarBomba
Posts: 2271
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2016 4:51 pm
Been Liked: 1470 times
Has Liked: 418 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by TsarBomba » Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:41 pm

Selling an academy product for £20M profit is the holy grail. We may not like losing McNeil, but it’s difficult to argue against it.

But ALK need to move quick now and bring a few big players in. Not loans. Not young kids. But proper players that will make a statement that we mean business.

If we don’t, then alarm bells will really start to ring.
This user liked this post: Enola Gay

CombatClaret
Posts: 4401
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:09 pm
Been Liked: 1844 times
Has Liked: 933 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by CombatClaret » Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:43 pm

Proven championship players were big signings for us when we were in the Premier League, even then the pick of the bunch were going elsewhere.

We might push the boat out for one but I can't see us getting much joy trying to prize away decent players from teams who are now our peers.
Last edited by CombatClaret on Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:45 pm, edited 2 times in total.
This user liked this post: RVclaret

Granny WeatherWax
Posts: 2915
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 3:20 pm
Been Liked: 728 times
Has Liked: 93 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Granny WeatherWax » Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:43 pm

ClaretPete001 wrote:
Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:39 pm
That's a bit like a thug punching you in the face and saying "I'm a thug what did you expect".

True, but not really the point.
He called it a fire sale, it’s really not.

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 13297
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1990 times
Has Liked: 391 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:43 pm

We need a marquee signing to boost the morale.

Chris Willock, Piroe someone like that

BigAlClaret
Posts: 156
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 3:57 pm
Been Liked: 57 times
Has Liked: 9 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by BigAlClaret » Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:44 pm

Wasn't it rumoured a few weeks ago by Nixon that should McNeil leave then Burnley would make a move for Jason Knight?

RVclaret
Posts: 16501
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4552 times
Has Liked: 3055 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by RVclaret » Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:45 pm

FCBurnley wrote:
Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:35 pm
Not the most inspiring presser I have ever heard by VK today
Not his fault. He was just reporting the facts as they are. Sounded like Max and Dwight will be gone to pay off the debt then bring in some more players on the cheap.
Are you and BurnleyFC the same poster :lol:

Robbo1882
Posts: 114
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 3:41 pm
Been Liked: 26 times
Has Liked: 9 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Robbo1882 » Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:47 pm

I agree a marquee signing will steady the ship, when do new players have to be registered to play on Friday?

Rileybobs
Posts: 18751
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 7700 times
Has Liked: 1593 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Rileybobs » Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:48 pm

Granny WeatherWax wrote:
Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:41 pm
Was always likely clubs would come in for Collins and McNeil, they are good players. Mee was a free, so very very likely a premier club would want him, can’t blame him, and we can’t compete with the premier league lure. Hennessy has a 2 year deal at forest and I suspect VK was more than happy for him to leave as it doesn’t fit the way he wants to play, and would be on a decent wedge.
Well individually there was a chance that they may all leave. But I didn’t think they all would. As for a couple of your points, we really don’t know about Hennessey and Mee, but there was speculation that we didn’t offer Mee a new contract - and I doubt Kompany would have been happy to lose Hennessey considering the keepers we were left with.

Granny WeatherWax
Posts: 2915
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 3:20 pm
Been Liked: 728 times
Has Liked: 93 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Granny WeatherWax » Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:51 pm

Rileybobs wrote:
Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:48 pm
Well individually there was a chance that they may all leave. But I didn’t think they all would. As for a couple of your points, we really don’t know about Hennessey and Mee, but there was speculation that we didn’t offer Mee a new contract - and I doubt Kompany would have been happy to lose Hennessey considering the keepers we were left with.
We will never know all the ins and outs of what’s going on, but I’m not surprised really of any of the outgoings.
This user liked this post: Enola Gay

taio
Posts: 12828
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3589 times
Has Liked: 406 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by taio » Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:52 pm

The concern among many fans isnt the sale of any single player but rather the cumulative effect of the exits. Two more key players on their way out. It's a good thing that these sales haven't occurred at the very end of the transfer window meaning the club has time to show they can make the necessary replacements.

Granny WeatherWax
Posts: 2915
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 3:20 pm
Been Liked: 728 times
Has Liked: 93 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Granny WeatherWax » Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:54 pm

taio wrote:
Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:52 pm
The concern among many fans isnt the sale of any single player but rather the cumulative effect of the exits. Two more key players on their way out. It's a good thing that these sales haven't occurred at the very end of the transfer window meaning the club has time to show they can make the necessary replacements.
Sure, huge player turnover, but mostly expected and nothing really we could do about it.

ClaretInLeeds
Posts: 900
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2021 8:36 pm
Been Liked: 359 times
Has Liked: 190 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by ClaretInLeeds » Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:55 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:43 pm
We need a marquee signing to boost the morale.

Chris Willock, Piroe someone like that
MOD: Totally unnecessary comment. Warning issued.

DCWat
Posts: 9973
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:04 am
Been Liked: 4500 times
Has Liked: 3921 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by DCWat » Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:56 pm

It’s to be hoped that some of the new signings prove to be a big success. It’ll be a short lived approach if not.

taio
Posts: 12828
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3589 times
Has Liked: 406 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by taio » Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:57 pm

Granny WeatherWax wrote:
Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:54 pm
Sure, huge player turnover, but mostly expected and nothing really we could do about it.
Multiple sales inevitable. The test, in time, will be have we adequately replaced them and found a reasonable balance or taken too many risks.

boatshed bill
Posts: 17366
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3565 times
Has Liked: 7832 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by boatshed bill » Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:57 pm

taio wrote:
Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:52 pm
The concern among many fans isnt the sale of any single player but rather the cumulative effect of the exits. Two more key players on their way out. It's a good thing that these sales haven't occurred at the very end of the transfer window meaning the club has time to show they can make the necessary replacements.
They don't want to stay . They don't want to try to get BFC back to the PL because they can get there without trying.

Nonayforever
Posts: 3693
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:15 pm
Been Liked: 791 times
Has Liked: 185 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Nonayforever » Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:57 pm

taio wrote:
Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:52 pm
The concern among many fans isnt the sale of any single player but rather the cumulative effect of the exits. Two more key players on their way out. It's a good thing that these sales haven't occurred at the very end of the transfer window meaning the club has time to show they can make the necessary replacements.
Yes, I agree, but the replacements in my view will never be Premier League quality.
Pace may be happy wheeling and dealing and making a buck but will Kompany ? Maybe for a short while but it won't last.

Paddy1882
Posts: 462
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 2:46 pm
Been Liked: 182 times
Has Liked: 20 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Paddy1882 » Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:58 pm

For me personally nothing wrong with my morale, I can’t wait for the new season, too see the new style of play and the new players etc. I’m also taking VK comments this afternoon with a pinch of salt, I think he’s being very clever and lowering expectations of us fans but also of potential selling clubs who’s players we may go for, the last thing we want is clubs thinking we have parachute payments and players sales money available so they in turn boost the price. By time we play Luton I think we will have 3/4 more potential starters added to the squad.

Vegas Claret
Posts: 34889
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 12709 times
Has Liked: 6319 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Vegas Claret » Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:58 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:43 pm
We need a marquee signing to boost the morale.

Chris Willock, Piroe someone like that
Piroe has told Swansea he wont sign an extended contract, Brighton are rumoured to be after him. ZERO chance we spend the kind of money that would be required to get him out of Swansea......

Granny WeatherWax
Posts: 2915
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 3:20 pm
Been Liked: 728 times
Has Liked: 93 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Granny WeatherWax » Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:58 pm

Nonayforever wrote:
Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:57 pm
Yes, I agree, but the replacements in my view will never be Premier League quality.
Pace may be happy wheeling and dealing and making a buck but will Kompany ? Maybe for a short while but it won't last.
We aren’t gonna sign premier league quality players in the championship!

taio
Posts: 12828
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3589 times
Has Liked: 406 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by taio » Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:59 pm

boatshed bill wrote:
Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:57 pm
They don't want to stay . They don't want to try to get BFC back to the PL because they can get there without trying.
I think you've missed my point.

Rileybobs
Posts: 18751
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 7700 times
Has Liked: 1593 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Rileybobs » Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:59 pm

Granny WeatherWax wrote:
Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:54 pm
Sure, huge player turnover, but mostly expected and nothing really we could do about it.
I don’t think either of those statements are true. On all the transfer speculation on here since relegation I haven’t seen anyone suggest we would lose all of Pope, Hennessey, Mee, Tarkowski, Collins, McNeil, Cornet and Weghorst - not to mention all of the other senior players who I think most people were happy that we released. And it’s absolutely not the case that we couldn’t do anything about some of these outgoings.

ClaretPete001
Posts: 3271
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2022 11:39 am
Been Liked: 550 times
Has Liked: 189 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by ClaretPete001 » Wed Jul 27, 2022 10:02 pm

Granny WeatherWax wrote:
Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:43 pm
He called it a fire sale, it’s really not.
Given this is a football forum and not one on semantic linguistics presumably you know what was meant...!

Presumably you could give the substantive point the benefit of the doubt and not bother yourself with the hyperbole. At this point it looks like we will lose up to 14 senior pros, all of our better players and have spent less than £8 million in return.

It's not a fire sale but it sure is beginning to feel like one.

Granny WeatherWax
Posts: 2915
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 3:20 pm
Been Liked: 728 times
Has Liked: 93 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Granny WeatherWax » Wed Jul 27, 2022 10:02 pm

Rileybobs wrote:
Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:59 pm
I don’t think either of those statements are true. On all the transfer speculation on here since relegation I haven’t seen anyone suggest we would lose all of Pope, Hennessey, Mee, Tarkowski, Collins, McNeil, Cornet and Weghorst - not to mention all of the other senior players who I think most people were happy that we released. And it’s absolutely not the case that we couldn’t do anything about some of these outgoings.
Ignoring Hennessy, and Weghorst aside cos he’s a knob, all the others are premier league quality. It’s hardly surprising clubs want them.

If a premier league club wants our players is such a naive view to think we can make them stay. Who wants an unhappy player?
This user liked this post: Enola Gay

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Lancasterclaret » Wed Jul 27, 2022 10:03 pm

Its a short career, its absolutely mental to stay at a club on less money when you can double it by moving, and you are good enough to move

I mean, it really is that simple

Longsider
Posts: 2801
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:03 pm
Been Liked: 948 times
Has Liked: 810 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Longsider » Wed Jul 27, 2022 10:03 pm

PaintYorkClaretnBlue wrote:
Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:38 pm
Basically he is saying that the core of our team was so old/out of contract we haven’t got anything for most of them!
You are not wrong with that one.

boatshed bill
Posts: 17366
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3565 times
Has Liked: 7832 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by boatshed bill » Wed Jul 27, 2022 10:03 pm

taio wrote:
Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:59 pm
I think you've missed my point.
Probably.

Granny WeatherWax
Posts: 2915
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 3:20 pm
Been Liked: 728 times
Has Liked: 93 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Granny WeatherWax » Wed Jul 27, 2022 10:04 pm

ClaretPete001 wrote:
Wed Jul 27, 2022 10:02 pm
Given this is a football forum and not one on semantic linguistics presumably you know what was meant...!

Presumably you could give the substantive point the benefit of the doubt and not bother yourself with the hyperbole. At this point it looks like we will lose up to 14 senior pros, all of our better players and have spent less than £8 million in return.

It's not a fire sale but it sure is beginning to feel like one.
I’m just not surprised at who we lost. Doesn’t mean I’m not apprehensive about the season ahead.

Paul Waine
Posts: 10237
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:28 pm
Been Liked: 2419 times
Has Liked: 3339 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Paul Waine » Wed Jul 27, 2022 10:05 pm

Rileybobs wrote:
Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:48 pm
Well individually there was a chance that they may all leave. But I didn’t think they all would. As for a couple of your points, we really don’t know about Hennessey and Mee, but there was speculation that we didn’t offer Mee a new contract - and I doubt Kompany would have been happy to lose Hennessey considering the keepers we were left with.
Imagine you are Ben Mee, imagine your Premier League contract paid £50k a week. Imagine the contract also said your wage would be reduced to less than £30k/week if relegated to the Championship. (Forget age and recent injury record). What wage do you expect to be offered by Burnley? What wage do you think you can get on a free transfer to a Premier League club, even if it's a club that only matches Burnley's modest (relatively speaking) Premier League wages?

scouseclaret
Posts: 2699
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 7:29 pm
Been Liked: 901 times
Has Liked: 273 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by scouseclaret » Wed Jul 27, 2022 10:05 pm

Granny WeatherWax wrote:
Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:35 pm
Who have we lost that you wouldn’t have expected too?
Pope, Mee and Tarko we couldn’t do anything about, but why sell Collins and Hennessey as well? Collins was under contract for another 4 years, so why sell him for £20m?

I expected to lose Cornet, and still do, but that being the case I’d hope we’d have held on the McNeil.

Weghorst made his feelings clear, but allowing him to go out on loan makes no sense and he still hasn’t been replaced.

We don’t seem to have exactly pulled out all the stops to keep contracted players and I fear we haven’t finished yet. Roberts? Taylor?

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 13297
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1990 times
Has Liked: 391 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Wed Jul 27, 2022 10:05 pm

Vegas Claret wrote:
Wed Jul 27, 2022 9:58 pm
Piroe has told Swansea he wont sign an extended contract, Brighton are rumoured to be after him. ZERO chance we spend the kind of money that would be required to get him out of Swansea......
Tbh he was more of an example.

However Willock on the other hand would be an exceptional signing.

Made QPR tick lay season

taio
Posts: 12828
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3589 times
Has Liked: 406 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by taio » Wed Jul 27, 2022 10:06 pm

boatshed bill wrote:
Wed Jul 27, 2022 10:03 pm
Probably.
Definitely. Because my point, and the post you replied to, wasn't just about players leaving but the importance of sufficient replacements and having time to achieve that.

Granny WeatherWax
Posts: 2915
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 3:20 pm
Been Liked: 728 times
Has Liked: 93 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Granny WeatherWax » Wed Jul 27, 2022 10:07 pm

scouseclaret wrote:
Wed Jul 27, 2022 10:05 pm
Pope, Mee and Tarko we couldn’t do anything about, but why sell Collins and Hennessey as well? Collins was under contract for another 4 years, so why sell him for £20m?

I expected to lose Cornet, and still do, but that being the case I’d hope we’d have held on the McNeil.

Weghorst made his feelings clear, but allowing him to go out on loan makes no sense and he still hasn’t been replaced.

We don’t seem to have exactly pulled out all the stops to keep contracted players and I fear we haven’t finished yet. Roberts? Taylor?
Why sell Collins? A premier league club came in for him, as soon as that happened he was off. You can’t keep players who don’t want to be here. And £20m for an inexperienced young centre half is decent money.

boatshed bill
Posts: 17366
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3565 times
Has Liked: 7832 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by boatshed bill » Wed Jul 27, 2022 10:07 pm

scouseclaret wrote:
Wed Jul 27, 2022 10:05 pm
Pope, Mee and Tarko we couldn’t do anything about, but why sell Collins and Hennessey as well? Collins was under contract for another 4 years, so why sell him for £20m?

I expected to lose Cornet, and still do, but that being the case I’d hope we’d have held on the McNeil.

Weghorst made his feelings clear, but allowing him to go out on loan makes no sense and he still hasn’t been replaced.

We don’t seem to have exactly pulled out all the stops to keep contracted players and I fear we haven’t finished yet. Roberts? Taylor?

It's because they really don't want to stay. It really is that simple.
This user liked this post: longsidepies

arise_sir_charge
Posts: 3235
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:36 am
Been Liked: 1776 times
Has Liked: 41 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by arise_sir_charge » Wed Jul 27, 2022 10:10 pm

ClaretPete001 wrote:
Wed Jul 27, 2022 10:02 pm
Given this is a football forum and not one on semantic linguistics presumably you know what was meant...!

Presumably you could give the substantive point the benefit of the doubt and not bother yourself with the hyperbole. At this point it looks like we will lose up to 14 senior pros, all of our better players and have spent less than £8 million in return.

It's not a fire sale but it sure is beginning to feel like one.
We’ve already spent more than £8m.

Rileybobs
Posts: 18751
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 7700 times
Has Liked: 1593 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Rileybobs » Wed Jul 27, 2022 10:13 pm

Granny WeatherWax wrote:
Wed Jul 27, 2022 10:02 pm
Ignoring Hennessy, and Weghorst aside cos he’s a knob, all the others are premier league quality. It’s hardly surprising clubs want them.

If a premier league club wants our players is such a naive view to think we can make them stay. Who wants an unhappy player?
Is it naive to think that Ben Mee would have stayed at Burnley? Really?

Lots of players don’t get the move they want. We’ve just been told to do one by Coventry despite the player seemingly being very keen on a move and a chance to make a lot more money. It’s not often a team is relegated and loses so many of their players.

It’s naive to think that this is more about player power than debt repayment in my view. Kompany even alluded to that in his press conference. And I have no problem with the debt being repaid, because I’m realistic. But it seems to me that the board have decided to put aside any realistic ambition of an immediate return to the PL by prioritising quick income to service the debt - which is very disappointing to me and seemingly some others.

I find this acceptance that all these players were always going to leave quite odd and certainly revisionist. I’m sure if you go back a few weeks on this forum the narrative was very different.
These 2 users liked this post: Spijed fatboy47

Granny WeatherWax
Posts: 2915
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 3:20 pm
Been Liked: 728 times
Has Liked: 93 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Granny WeatherWax » Wed Jul 27, 2022 10:16 pm

Rileybobs wrote:
Wed Jul 27, 2022 10:13 pm
Is it naive to think that Ben Mee would have stayed at Burnley? Really?

Lots of players don’t get the move they want. We’ve just been told to do one by Coventry despite the player seemingly being very keen on a move and a chance to make a lot more money. It’s not often a team is relegated and loses so many of their players.

It’s naive to think that this is more about player power than debt repayment in my view. Kompany even alluded to that in his press conference. And I have no problem with the debt being repaid, because I’m realistic. But it seems to me that the board have decided to put aside any realistic ambition of an immediate return to the PL by prioritising quick income to service the debt - which is very disappointing to me and seemingly some others.

I find this acceptance that all these players were always going to leave quite odd and certainly revisionist. I’m sure if you go back a few weeks on this forum the narrative was very different.
He’s just signed for a premier league club, so yeah I think it’s very naive to think he would have stayed here AND Kompany is changing how we play, he was on a monster wage, to who is to say he even wanted him to stay.

Pretty sure if Mee wanted to stay and Kompany wanted him then it would have happened.
This user liked this post: GodIsADeeJay81

Vegas Claret
Posts: 34889
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 12709 times
Has Liked: 6319 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Vegas Claret » Wed Jul 27, 2022 10:16 pm

I think we know what the answer to this will probably be
Attachments
Screenshot 2022-07-27 2.15.17 PM.png
Screenshot 2022-07-27 2.15.17 PM.png (67.4 KiB) Viewed 2380 times

Rileybobs
Posts: 18751
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 7700 times
Has Liked: 1593 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Rileybobs » Wed Jul 27, 2022 10:17 pm

Paul Waine wrote:
Wed Jul 27, 2022 10:05 pm
Imagine you are Ben Mee, imagine your Premier League contract paid £50k a week. Imagine the contract also said your wage would be reduced to less than £30k/week if relegated to the Championship. (Forget age and recent injury record). What wage do you expect to be offered by Burnley? What wage do you think you can get on a free transfer to a Premier League club, even if it's a club that only matches Burnley's modest (relatively speaking) Premier League wages?
We don’t know how Mee’s salary at Brentford compares to what his salary would have been at Burnley. We also don’t know whether he was offered a new contract or not. We also don’t know, at this stage of his career, whether he would have been happy spending the last couple of years at the club where he has spent almost his entire professional career, living in the region where his young family is settled.

Let’s not now pretend that Ben Mee was always going to leave.
This user liked this post: fatboy47

Granny WeatherWax
Posts: 2915
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 3:20 pm
Been Liked: 728 times
Has Liked: 93 times

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Granny WeatherWax » Wed Jul 27, 2022 10:19 pm

Rileybobs wrote:
Wed Jul 27, 2022 10:17 pm
We don’t know how Mee’s salary at Brentford compares to what his salary would have been at Burnley. We also don’t know whether he was offered a new contract or not. We also don’t know, at this stage of his career, whether he would have been happy spending the last couple of years at the club where he has spent almost his entire professional career, living in the region where his young family is settled.

Let’s not now pretend that Ben Mee was always going to leave.
But it’s not surprising he has left, which has been my point this evening.

Rileybobs
Posts: 18751
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 7700 times
Has Liked: 1593 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Transfer Rumours Thread - NO FINANCIAL DISCUSSION

Post by Rileybobs » Wed Jul 27, 2022 10:20 pm

Granny WeatherWax wrote:
Wed Jul 27, 2022 10:16 pm
He’s just signed for a premier league club, so yeah I think it’s very naive to think he would have stayed here AND Kompany is changing how we play, he was on a monster wage, to who is to say he even wanted him to stay.

Pretty sure if Mee wanted to stay and Kompany wanted him then it would have happened.
Well yeah. That’s my point, if Kompany or Pace didn’t want him (which none of us seem to know) then that would be a poor decision by the club in my view.

Post Reply